Posts Tagged ‘Commonwealth Fund’

The Affordable Care Act: A Tale of Two Studies

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

A study of medical bills under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) determined that most households will be able to afford premiums and related expenses after paying bills for food, child care, transportation and other necessities, according to the Commonwealth Fund. The mission of The Commonwealth Fund is to promote a high performing health care system that achieves better access, improved quality, and greater efficiency, particularly for society’s most vulnerable, including low-income people, the uninsured, minority Americans, young children, and elderly adults.

Approximately 8.5 to nine percent of American families living closest to the poverty line could not afford basic necessities and typical medical bills proposed by the health reform law.  The ACA requires individuals to purchase insurance by 2014, although with occasional exceptions.  The ACA restricts household out-of-pocket costs and subsidizes plans available through insurance exchanges to people with low-incomes.  Fewer households in high cost-of-living states could afford healthcare expenses, according to the Commonwealth Fund study.  The report included projections of spending on necessities, premiums and out-of-pocket costs for households between the federal poverty line and 500 percent of the threshold.  Those insured by safety net or state run insurance exchanges were not factored into the study.

Even with implementation of the ACA, some families across all income levels would continue to struggle to afford coverage because of steep out-of-pocket costs.  According to the report, 17 percent of families of four earning up to $44,700; approximately 25 percent of families earning between $44,700 and $67,050, would struggle with healthcare costs.  The data examines costs in 2014, the first year the ACA will be fully implemented and the start of state-based health insurance exchanges.  The law provides federal subsidies for the lowest-income people to buy insurance.  Americans with incomes between 133 and 399 percent of the poverty level are eligible for income-based tax credits.  Some low-income people will be eligible for subsidies to make up for out-of-pocket costs.  Americans who make less than 133 percent of the poverty level are eligible for Medicaid.

“The Affordable Care Act is very good news for millions of Americans who are struggling to afford health care, going without health insurance, or skipping the care they need because they can’t afford it,” said Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis. “The new law makes health insurance and health care affordable for nearly all families, and introduces delivery system reforms that have the potential to greatly improve quality and efficiency.  If implemented well, new entities like accountable care organizations may bring even greater savings and affordability than this report predicts.”

Although the Commonwealth report is positive about the likelihood that more families will be able to afford health insurance, Craig Pollack, M.D., M.H.S., assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins, and Katrina Armstrong, M.D., from the University of Pennsylvania, are not as upbeat about the ACA.  The physicians warn that as a result of certain provisions in the ACA, wealthy hospitals and physician practices might “cherry-pick” similar institutions and create Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  In this way, they can avoid poor and minority-heavy patient populations who will be treated elsewhere to cut costs.  ACOs encourage patients to seek care within their own network, which highlights the disparities between networks.

According to Pollack, hospitals and physician practices that treat too many minorities may be unable to join ACOs and will fall further behind in the cost and quality of care that is likely to occur in such networks.  “There is ample evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare,” Pollack said.  “Hospitals and private practices that care for greater numbers of minorities tend to have larger populations of Medicaid and uninsured patients.  These patients have less access to specialists, and their hospitals and practices tend to have fewer institutional resources than their counterparts.”

Nine Million Americans Lost Healthcare Coverage During the Recession

Monday, April 4th, 2011

The financial crisis not only robbed nine million Americans of their jobs – but also their healthcare insurance. According to a new study by The Commonwealth Fund, only 25 percent of Americans who lost employer-sponsored healthcare coverage succeeded at finding another source.  As a result, an estimated 52 million Americans did not have healthcare coverage in 2010.  Even though the federal government provides a subsidy, just 14 percent of people who lost their jobs continued their coverage through COBRA.

According to The Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey of 2010, “Using data from The Commonwealth Biennial Health Insurance Survey of 2010 and prior years, this report examines the effect of the recession on the health insurance coverage of adults between the ages of 19 and 64 and the implications for both their finances and their access to healthcare.  The survey of 3,033 adults, conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from July 2010 to November 2010, finds that in the last two years a majority of men and women who lost a job that had health benefits became uninsured.  Adults who sought coverage on the individual insurance market over the past three years struggled to find plans they could afford and many were charged higher premiums, had a health condition excluded from their coverage, or were denied coverage altogether because of a pre-existing condition.  Meanwhile, Americans with health insurance had higher deductibles and consequently greater exposure to medical costs.  And millions were struggling to pay medical bills, facing cost-related barriers to getting the care they need, or skipping or delaying needed care, including prescription medications, because of the cost.”

Just 50 percent of adults aged 64 or less are current with preventive care.  Fully 49 million employed Americans spent 10 percent or more of their yearly income on out-of-pocket costs and insurance premiums, a sharp increase from the 31 million reported in 2001.  Once the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) goes into full effect in 2014, the situation is likely to improve dramatically.  “These reforms have enormous potential to begin solving the problems identified in this report,” said Sara Collins, vice president of The Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation that promotes a high performing healthcare system that achieves better access, improved quality, and greater efficiency, particularly for society’s most vulnerable, including low-income people, the uninsured, minority Americans, children, and the elderly.

“The report tells the story of the continuing deterioration of healthcare accessibility, efficiency, safety and affordability over the past decade,” said The Commonwealth Fund president Karen Davis. “All this despite the fact that the United States spends more than any other country on healthcare.  Most recently it has failed the millions of Americans who lost their jobs during the recession and lost health benefits as well, leaving them with no place to turn for affordable healthcare coverage.  The silver lining is that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has already begun to bring relief to families,” Davis said.  “Once the new law is fully implemented, we can be confident that no future recession will have the power to strip so many Americans of their health security.”

Of those people who attempted to buy an individual plan during the study’s timeframe — 19 million individuals – or 71 percent found it difficult or impossible to locate a plan they could afford and met their needs, were denied coverage or charged extra because of a pre-existing medical condition.  Adults with family incomes of less than $22,050 for a family of four were hardest hit with 54 percent having no healthcare insurance.  An additional 41 percent of families with incomes of between $22,050 and $44,100 had no coverage.  Of higher-income families, just 13 percent lacked healthcare coverage in 2010.

Conservative groups such as the Heritage Foundation are critical of the healthcare reform law.  The Washington, D.C.-based think tank wants changes made to the healthcare system to make it less reliant on government and to have individuals “own and control their own healthcare policies.”  Additionally, Heritage believes that the healthcare law will increase government spending.  “Of course there’s some people who will benefit from the law, but just focusing on individuals with benefits is misleading,” said Brian Blase, a policy analyst in health studies.  “You have to look at the law in its totality.”

Majority of Baby Boomers Under 65 Will Be Covered by Healthcare Reform

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

Approximately 8.2 million of the 8.6 million uninsured baby boomers (Americans between the ages of 50 and 64) will have access to healthcare coverage in 2014, thanks to the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  This is just one finding of a new study by the Commonwealth Fund, entitled Realizing Health Reform’s Potential:  Adults Ages 50 – 64 and the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

According to the study, 3.5 million insured boomers will be eligible for subsidized private insurance; another 3.3 million will qualify for Medicaid; and 1.4 million will be able to access non-subsidized private insurance.  Those without coverage will include approximately 377,000 undocumented immigrants.

Unemployment drives much of the baby boomers’ need for healthcare coverage.  The Commonwealth Fund study notes that “Losses in coverage in the 50 – to — 64 age group have been driven by record high unemployment.  Approximately 2.2 million workers aged 55 and older were unemployed in November 2010.  Unemployed workers between the ages of 55 and 64 had been jobless for an average of 45 weeks, the highest unemployment duration for any group under age 65 in this time period.  As a result, the number of uninsured people in this age group climbed in 2010 as options for affordable healthcare dwindled and family budgets became more constrained.”

The Commonwealth Fund said early provisions in the health reform law that could benefit baby boomers  also include the following:

  • Create high-risk pools for people with pre-existing conditions
  • Impose a ban on lifetime coverage limits and gradually eliminate annual limits
  • Cover preventive services
  • Create an early retiree reinsurance program
  • Create a new long-term care insurance program

Employer Healthcare Coverage Costs Americans More and Offers Less

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

American families with employer-sponsored health insurance are paying more for inferior coverage, according to a new study from the Commonwealth Fund

According to the study, premiums for family coverage rose 41 percent between 2003 and 2009, more than three times faster than median incomes.  Deductibles on a yearly basis rose 77 percent.

According to the study’s authors, “Fortunately, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) contains a significant number of coverage and delivery system reform provisions designed to reduce cost growth and provide financial protection, while improving the quality of healthcare.  The creation of state-based health insurance exchanges, the introduction of new market rules and consumer protections, and the expansion of state and federal oversight of industry practices will begin to increase value in U.S. health insurance markets.  Further analysis suggests that the incentives for administrative efficiency and modernization included in the ACA have the potential to save businesses and families $2,000 or more in premium costs by 2019.”

Whether you live in Montana, Texas, or New York, private insurance costs have been increasing faster than working family incomes,” said Commonwealth Fund Senior Vice President Cathy Schoen, the study’s lead author.   “For more than a decade, families with job-based insurance have been sacrificing wages to hold on to health insurance. The good news is that the Affordable Care Act reforms provide a foundation to improve coverage and slow healthcare cost growth in the future.”

“Health insurance is increasingly unaffordable for families, and benefits are being scaled back as employers and workers struggle to keep up in a difficult economy,” said Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis.  “If implemented well, provisions in the Affordable Care Act — including some starting this year, such as tax credits for small businesses to provide coverage, dependent coverage for young adults up to age 26, and elimination of co-payments for preventive care — have the opportunity to reverse these unsustainable increases and ensure that families in every state have access to affordable, comprehensive health insurance.”

Older Americans Tend to Be Sicker than Britons – Until Their 70th Birthdays

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

Americans are sicker than Britons until they are 70.  Older Americans tend to be sicker than their British counterparts.  Once they celebrate their 70th birthdays, however, Americans can expect to live longer.  This is one finding in a study conducted by RAND Corporation, the California-based research institute. American longevity could be due to their country’s expensive healthcare system, said James P. Smith, a Rand economist and demographics expert.  “We actually get something from it,” Smith said.  “We are sicker than the English and we have to spend a lot.”  Apparently, all those expensive tests “diagnosing chronic illnesses early, and how aggressive we treat those things” make the difference.

Healthcare spending in the United States ate up $2.3 trillion in 2008 – comprising 16 percent of the total economy.  By contrast, British healthcare spending was just 8.7 percent of that nation’s significantly smaller GDP.  According to James Banks, an economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies in London, mortality rates for cancer and stroke are higher in Britain than in continental Europe.  Healthcare spending in Europe is “a few percentage points higher” than in Britain.  Healthcare rationing is another issue.  “There is more rationing in the U.K. than there is here,” said Dr. Peter A. Meunnig, a health policy expert at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

According to Banks’ study, Americans in their 70s were twice as likely to have cancer and diabetes as their British counterparts.  Americans were also more apt to have high blood pressure, heart disease, heart attacks, strokes and chronic lung disease.  In both countries, the groups studied were older, white and had insurance coverage.  Banks believes that more healthcare is “focused on the elderly” in the United States than in England, although this may be changing.  “The (British) government in recent years has been targeting cancer, heart disease and stroke,” he said.

It’s Time to Shed Light on Healthcare Spending

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

As much as 40 percent of American healthcare spending brings no benefit.  The healthcare system in the United States significantly under performs every other industrialized nation, with the result that too many Americans either die or are harmed every year.  This is the opinion of Louise Probst, Executive Director of the St. Louis Area Business Health Coalition.  Writing for the Commonwealth Fund, Probst says that “Since the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) executive summary to its landmark report To Err is Human was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the IOM estimate that up to 30 percent of all healthcare expenditures pay for care with little or no health benefit fails to shock.  Experts now predict that 40 percent or more of all spending has little or no benefit.  Meanwhile, the average cost of health insurance for a family of four has grown to more than $14,000 annually.”  The Commonwealth Fund promotes a high-performing healthcare system that achieves better access, improved quality, and greater efficiency, particularly for society’s most vulnerable — low-income people, the uninsured, minority Americans, young children and the elderly.

According to Probst, “High healthcare costs create significant suffering for American families, businesses and governments.  Other leading nations spend half of what we do on healthcare, making it increasingly difficult for families to retain their standard of living and for American businesses to compete in a global economy.”  Each and every American pays the nation’s healthcare tab indirectly through smaller paychecks, higher taxes and health benefit costs hidden in the price of non-healthcare goods.  Compounding the situation is the fact that the jobs that the nation needs to make up for these costs are being outsourced to nations where healthcare is cheaper.  “The outcome is soberly clear:  In 2009, one of even seven Americans lived in poverty and 50 million Americans were uninsured, according to the U.S. Census,” Probst said.

Why is it that healthcare consumers know so little about spending and the waste associated with it?  Probst says that “Despite consistent calls for price and quality transparency from the business community since the ‘buy-right’ movement of the early 1980s, the IOM’s call for action more than a decade ago, and the sustained effort of many labor and consumer groups, our nation has yet to achieve meaningful transparency.  As long as price differences remain opaque to patients and their physicians, there is little hope for improving the affordability and efficiency of American healthcare.”

Healthcare Leaders Prefer Standardized Payments

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

71 percent of healthcare leaders support standardized payment system.  It seems as if the only way to control rising healthcare costs is to create a standardized payment structure.  This is the primary finding of the 22nd Commonwealth Fund/Modern Healthcare Opinion Leaders survey, which studied disclosure and pricing in the healthcare industry.  More than two-thirds of the 190 individuals who responded to the survey – fully 71 percent – said it is “very important” or “important” that “all payers use the same basic method of payment for rewarding quality and efficiency.”

Just 12 percent of survey respondents don’t believe that a standardized payment structure will impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare.  All groups of survey respondents strongly supported the perception of a common payment structure for private insurers.  Fully 72 percent of respondents representing academia and research institutes voiced support for the concept, compared with 79 percent from healthcare delivery organizations, as well as 77 percent form insurers and other health businesses.  A total of 54 percent favor the concept.

Commenting on the study, Louise Probst, Executive Director of the St. Louis Area Business Health Coalition, saidWe all know the drill. The American healthcare system seriously underperforms when compared with the health systems of every other industrialized nation.  As a result, each year, large numbers of Americans are harmed or die unnecessarily.  In fact, since the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) executive summary to its landmark report To Err Is Human was published in the Journal of American Medical Association in September 1999, additional research has only confirmed its findings.  A decade later, the IOM estimate that up to 30 percent of all healthcare expenditures pay for care with little or no health benefit fails to shock. Experts now project that 40 percent or more of all spending has little or no benefit.  Meanwhile, the average cost of health insurance for a family of four has grown to more than $14,000 annually.”

Small Business Healthcare Tax Credit a Boon to Companies

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Small business tax credits could save small businesses $2,359 per employee covered by a family plan.  Approximately 3.4 million Americans who work for the nation’s one million small businesses can take advantage of a healthcare premium tax credit, according to a report by the Commonwealth Fund.  In all, 16.6 million employees are eligible for the tax credit that is one element of the healthcare reform law.

Small employers can take advantage of tax credits to compensate for the cost of as much as 35 percent of the company’s premiums.  To be eligible, companies must have fewer than 25 workers or already pay more than 50 percent of their employees’ premiums.  Four years from now, the credit rises to 50 percent of a company’s premium contribution.  Tax-exempt organizations also qualify, but at a lower rate.

The tax credits are intended to save small businesses $2,359 per employee covered by a family plan in 2014.  According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, the tax credits could save up to $40 billion for small businesses over the next decade and reduce yearly premiums by eight to 11 percent by 2016.

“It really is an economic stimulus measure that will help small businesses get through these tough economic times,” according to Karen Davis, the Commonwealth Fund’s president.

Standardized Medical Billing Could Save $7 Billion a Year

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Physicians could save $7 billion a year if insurers standardized medical billing procedures.  If healthcare insurance companies created a standardized billing system, it could cut physician office administrative costs by $7 billion a year, according to a study published in Health Affairs. Standardizing medical billing would assure transparency, as well as create a single claim submission deadline and payment posting rules.

That estimate is based on a 2006 analysis of the labor and overhead costs required to process health insurance benefits and claims at one large academic physician group practice.  According to the study, the physician group could hypothetically save $44 million if it processed all benefits and claims using Medicare payment rules.  Paperwork and follow-up with insurers totaled $33.1 million, while office labor and overhead ate up an additional $5.6 million that could be saved with standardized billing procedures.

According to the study’s authors, “The U.S. system of billing third parties for healthcare services is complex, expensive, and inefficient.  Physicians end up using nearly 12 percent of their net patient service revenue to cover the costs of excessive administrative complexity.  A single transparent set of payment rules for multiple payers, a single claim form, and standard rules of submission, among other innovations, would reduce the burden on the billing offices of physician organizations.  On a national scale, our hypothetical modeling of these changes would translate into $7 billion of savings annually for physician and clinical services.  Four hours of professional time per physician and five hours of practice support staff time could be saved each week.”

Healthcare Costs Add Up to 17.3 Percent of GDP in 2009

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Healthcare spending in 2009 reached a record high of 17.3 percent of the nation’s GDP, representing a growth rate of 5.7 percent in a year when the general GDP shrank.  The Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit and non-partisan group reports that healthcare costs for the average family have doubled over the past 10 years.Healthcare costs an average family $13,375 yearly, representing a 131 percent increase over 10 years.

The almost $2.5 trillion spent in 2009 was $134 billion more than 2008, when healthcare ate up 16.2 percent of the GDP, according to an annual report by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).  “The health system is hurting, and we are seeing that in these numbers,” said Karen David, president of the Commonwealth Fund, a healthcare policy authority.  Federal and state spending on Medicaid – the primary health insurance program for low-income Americans – climbed nearly 10 percent in 2009, according to the report.  Medicate spending increased eight percent last year.

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the average premium for a company-provided family health insurance plan soared from $5,791 in 1999 to $13,375, a 131 percent increase.  Employees’ portions of those costs have also risen, from $1,543 on average 10 years ago to $3,515 in 2009.

During 2010, companies said they planned to shift more costs to workers, with 42 percent saying they would increase employees’ premiums and 39 percent said employees would pay more for doctor visits.  Another 37 percent said workers would have to pay more for prescriptions.  “When healthcare costs continue to rise so much faster than overall inflation in a bad recession, workers and employers really feel the pain.  That’s why we are having a health reform debate,” said Drew Altman, Kaiser’s president and CEO.