Posts Tagged ‘Congressional Democrats’

Insurer Denies Teenage Girl Coverage Because She Was Diagnosed With an Overbite at Age 8

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

Insurance company cancelled teenager’s coverage because she was diagnosed with an overbite at age 8.  A suburban Chicago teenager had her healthcare coverage rescinded when her parents’ insurance company learned that she had been diagnosed with an overbite at age eight. An orthodontist and braces cured the overbite, but the insurer cancelled the girl’s coverage by claiming it was a pre-existing condition.  The girl’s parents fought back and – thanks to strong support from Illinois insurance regulators – the coverage has now been reinstated.

Thanks to healthcare reform legislation, this practice – known as rescission – will no longer be allowed as of late September except in cases where fraud is involved.  Illinois has one of the nation’s highest rescission rates with 12.9 for every 1,000 policies written.  The girl’s father, an attorney employed at a small firm, buys individual coverage for his family.  Insurance regulators say that rescission is most common in these circumstances.  People who are covered by company-sponsored programs rarely face rescission.  According to the girl’s father, “We didn’t try to hide anything.  Our orthodontist told us her mandibular hypoplasia was routine, and it was nothing the insurance company even asked us about on our application.  From our perspective, they didn’t even ask for the names of any of our children’s dentists or orthodontists.”

“There’s now a defined legal standard for when a rescission is appropriate,” said Michael McRaith, Illinois Insurance Director.  “In Illinois, our law was ambiguous, vague and left wide latitude and discretion with the insurance industry.”  The insurance industry defends rescissions as a necessary business practice when people misrepresented or lied about their medical histories on their applications.  Rescissions affect approximately seven percent of the population with private insurance who purchase individual policies.  Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, a lobbying group, said “Rescissions are very rare.  They are only used as a last resort.”

Congressional Democrats take another view.  “It was viewed by Congress as the tip of the spear,” said Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL).  “It typifies the practices of the insurance industry to maximize their profits that were so clearly anti-consumer and harmful to people who were counting on their health insurance at the moment they needed it the most.”

The Loyal Opposition

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

The Republican National Committee’s (RNC) response to the Obama Administration’s and Congressional Democrats’ efforts to pass healthcare reform legislation was to sponsor a “Hillarycare revisited” fund raising effort.

The RNC warned against “Obamacare” and pointed out that the government “already run2008-08-23-dnc-081s car companies, banks and mortgage companies.  Republicans believe that the last thing the American people want is government telling them when and where – or even whether – they can get medical treatment for their families.”  “Hillarycare” refers to former President Bill Clinton’s failed attempt at reforming healthcare during the 1990s, an effort led by his wife, Hillary Clinton.

Republicans like John Boehner (R-OH) have raised the specter of a “bureaucrat standing between you and your doctor.”  Perhaps it’s worth considering that we currently have an insurance company bureaucrat performing the same role.  Also, government administered health options are almost uniformly popular.  The World Health Organization ranks France’s healthcare system as the world’s finest, contrasted to the United States, which scored 37th.  The United Kingdom’s combination of publicly and privately funded healthcare ranked 18th in the World Health Organization’s survey.

Democrats May Use “Nuclear Option” to Pass Healthcare Reform

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

The Obama administration is playing hardball to force Congress to pass healthcare reform legislation before the end of the year – preferably without the customary Republican-led filibuster delaying the final vote. obamahealthcare President Obama’s aggressive approach to protect healthcare legislation from Republican filibusters demonstrates the magnitude this ambitious reform package and has come to be called in some circles the nuclear option.

The agreement between the White House and Congressional Democrats lets healthcare legislation that meets budget targets win approval by a simple Senate majority — a process called reconciliation.  Not surprisingly, Republican leaders are up in arms about the no-filibuster deal, claiming that healthcare is too important to be exempt from the Senate’s usual rules.

Republicans have threatened to use their own procedural weapons to bog down the Senate if the Democrats try to restrict filibusters.  Options include forcing multiple votes on routine bills, inaction on administration nominations, or requiring lengthy legislation to be read in full.  Even some Democrats – notably Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Max Baucus of Montana – are uncomfortable with reconciliation.  Other Democrats point out that Senate Republicans successfully used reconciliation to enact President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

The president is relying on his significant political capital to push his agenda through, relying on unwavering support from his sizable Senate Democratic majority.  This is likely to total 60 Senators once the Minnesota courts finally certify Al Franken’s victory, and as a result of Arlen Specter’s surprise exit from the Republican Party. That could give President Obama the filibuster-proof majority he wants.