Posts Tagged ‘death panels’

Physician Groups Go After Unnecessary Medical Tests

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

America’s physicians are embarking on an initiative to cut healthcare costs by ordering fewer unnecessary tests and treatments for their patients.  Nine prominent physician groups released lists of 45 common procedures they say are often unnecessary and may even harm patients. According to Kaiser Health News, “The move represents a high-profile effort by physicians to help reduce the extraordinary amount of unnecessary treatment, said to account for as much as a third of the $2.6 trillion Americans spend on healthcare each year.  Each of the societies, representing both primary care doctors and specialists, picked five procedures that medical evidence shows have little or no value for certain conditions, and which they say should be questioned by patients and their doctors.  The list includes such common practices as routine electrocardiograms for patients at low risk for heart disease, and antibiotics for mild sinus infections.”

Dr. Donald Berwick, formerly the Medicare administrator, called the campaign “a game changer.  This could be a turning point if it’s approached with energy,” Berwick said.  “Here you have scientifically grounded guidance from a number of major specialty societies addressing a very important problem, which is the overuse of ineffective care.”

“We need to use this opportunity to raise awareness that sometimes overtreatment or testing can be harmful,” said Glen Stream, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, one of the nine participating physician groups.  The Choosing Wisely campaign comes amid efforts – some called for in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) – to compare the effectiveness of treatments and to change payment incentives to physicians and hospitals to reward quality and penalize inefficiency.  But efforts to slow medical spending growth tend to be political, giving rise to fears of healthcare rationing or death panels.  “Anytime you are recommending against a test or treatment, people wonder ‘is it for some economic interest?’” Stream noted.

Among the nine groups backing the initiative are the American College of Cardiology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.  The effort is being spearheaded by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation (ABIM). Together, the participants represent nearly 375,000 physicians.

Writing in Time, Alice Park says that “Each of the nine professional groups has come up with five tests or procedures that it believes doctors and patients overuse routinely. The American Gastroenterological Association, for example, is recommending against repeat colonoscopies within 10 years of a normal result from a first colonoscopy for patients with no family history of colon cancer.  The American College of Physicians is advising against using MRI to image patients any time they complain of generalized low back pain, and heart experts say doctors should stop using stress echocardiograms in routine check-ups for patients who don’t have chest pain or other risk factors for heart disease or heart attack.”

One of the initiative’s goals is to make people “feel empowered to go to their doctor and say, ‘Do I really need this test?’” said Christine Cassel, president of the ABIM and the group’s foundation. John Santa, an internist and the director of the Health Ratings Center for Consumer Reports, said, “I think it’s courageous of cardiologists, internists and family physicians to suggest reducing services that they know generate income for some of their members.  I’m sure some of their members won’t be happy.”

According to Dr. Steven Weinberger, CEO of the American College of Physicians, “Most of us feel something like $750 billion or so could be eliminated from the system that we spend on healthcare.”  Weinberger said that unneeded diagnostic tests almost certainly account for $250 billion annually.  “I talk about this a fair amount around the country, and invariably physicians come up to me and recount their own anecdotes about overuse and misuse of care.”

Healthcare Lobbyists Busy on Capitol Hill

Thursday, April 7th, 2011

Even though the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the law of the land, the healthcare lobby is alive and well. Various federal agencies are working on full implementation of the law in 2014.  And with legislative tweaks and efforts to defund the law underway, lobbying on healthcare is ongoing.  So far, more than 180 groups have registered to continue shaping the law, according to the Sunlight Foundation.

Ever since President Barack Obama began the long journey to reform, healthcare lobbyists went into high gear.  During 2009 and 2010, $1.06 billion was spent on lobbying; more than $500 million was spent lobbying the legislation in each year, according to a report from the Center for Responsive Politics. Lobbyists for 1,251 organizations worked on healthcare reform in 2009 and 2010, according to the Sunlight Foundation.  Individual lobbyists who reported working on health related legislation totaled 3,154 in 2010, with Big Pharma topping the list.  The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America spent $22 million and employs 52 lobbyists.  Political donors with ties to the healthcare sector raised $137 million for federal candidates in the 2010 elections.  That is $30 million less than that sector raised during the 2008 presidential race.

Barbara Kennelley, a former Congresswoman and current President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, notes that lobbyists tried to raise an alarm among senior citizens about how the law might impact Medicare. “When the Affordable Care Act became law last March, critics predicted doom for the seniors and people with disabilities who rely on Medicare.  They said that coverage would disappear, benefits would be cut, and death panels were on their way – none of which was true.  But these lies scared many seniors about the law before it was explained to them.  Now, one year later, as the implementation of the law moves forward, Medicare is still sound – it’s stronger than it was before the law was passed – and millions of people with Medicare are benefitting from the law.”

Medicare has cracked down hard on waste, fraud, and abuse.  The Obama administration last year recovered $4 billion in Medicare fraud.  Additionally, the Affordable Care Act provides tools to crack down even further, specifically saying that Medicare’s guaranteed benefits – hospital care, doctors’ services, home health services, drug coverage, etc. – are protected.  “Benefits are as good as ever – better, in fact, Kennelly said.  “Prescription drugs are more affordable.  This year the nearly four million beneficiaries who fall into the prescription drug ‘doughnut hole’ will receive discounts on their drugs.  These discounts will increase over the next few years until the doughnut hole is closed.”

It’s now 2011 and the lobbying is still going full steam ahead. So far this year, more than 180 firms have registered to lobby for new clients on healthcare issues, 16 of which disclosed the Affordable Care Act as a specific lobbying interest, according to Sunlight’s Lobbying Registration Tracker.

The Obama administration is frustrated that the battle against healthcare reform hasn’t ended. “There still is a lot of intentional misinformation by opponents that continues to be repeated,” said Kathleen Sebelius, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary.  Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack agrees with Sebelius and believes that perceptions of the law are shifting as the benefits are implemented.  Vilsack noted that as farmers and small businesses file their 2010 tax returns, they are seeing a tax credit for small businesses of up to 35 percent for premiums paid on health insurance for employees.  “I think the acceptance of this and the awareness of this is going to grow substantially,” Vilsack said.

Arizona Halts Medicaid Funding for Some Transplant Surgeries

Friday, December 17th, 2010

The State of Arizona – facing soaring enrollments and shrinking revenues – has eliminated Medicaid coverage for some transplants of the heart, liver, lungs, pancreas and bone marrow.  Because these treatments are usually considered to be life saving, the consequences for Medicaid patients in Arizona requiring transplantation are grim.  The cut, which impacts approximately 100 Arizonans, is a clear demonstration of the fiscal pressure that states are facing.

“It’s a real sign of the times,” said Alan Weil, executive director of the National Academy for State Health Policy.  “And I think this is a precursor to a much larger number of states having this discussion.”  These policy implications are all the more striking, given the partisan framing of the healthcare debate.  Republican arguments against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act frequently focus on the specter of healthcare rationing and even the so-called death panels.  Democrats counter with the argument that – because 50 million Americans currently lack coverage – healthcare is already being rationed.

Diane Rowland, director of the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, said that Arizona’s move “is a classic example of making decisions based not on medical need but based on a budget.  It results, potentially, in denial of care to individuals in a life-or-death situation.”  Dr. Robert Gaston, president-elect of the American Society of Transplantation, agrees, noting that “It seems inappropriate that life-saving care has the potential to be withheld based solely on budgetary issues and the bureaucratic determination of relative benefits.”

Earlier this year, Arizona became the only state to almost eliminate its Children’s Health Insurance Program, which would have impacted 47,000 children from lower-income families.  State legislators reversed this decision before the effective date, but only after concluding that the state might lose billions of dollars in matching money from the federal government

Healthcare Reform Rhetoric Goes Over the Edge

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Just when you thought that the Congressional debate over healthcare reform couldn’t get uglier than talk of “death panels”, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) went that extra step by inferring that a Democratic senator needed to die or become incapacitated so the legislation would fail.  Just hours before a 1 a.m. procedural vote requiring a 60-vote majority, Coburn – who is a practicing physician – went to the Senate floor and proposed a prayer.  He said, “What the American people ought to pray is that somebody can’t make the vote tonight.  That’s what they ought to pray,” Coburn said.

It was clear to shocked Senators that Coburn was referring to Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who is 92, in frail health and wheelchair-bound.  Bringing Senator Byrd to the Senate for a middle-of-the-night vote in a city that had been walloped by an 18-inch snowfall the day before would be no easy task.  So incensed was Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), the Senate majority whip, that he responded “When it reaches a point where we’re praying, asking people to pray, that senators wouldn’t be able to answer the roll call, I think it has crossed the line.”

The Democrats were no innocents either when it came to over-the-top oratory.  Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) earlier gave a speech in which he referenced the French Revolution, Kristallnacht and Southern lynch mobs.  In Whitehouse’s words, “Too many colleagues are embarked on a desperate, no-holds-barred mission of propaganda, obstruction and fear.  History cautions us of the excesses to which these malignant, vindictive passions can ultimately lead.  Tumbrils have rolled through taunting crowds.  Broken glass has sparkled in darkened streets.  Strange fruit has hung from Southern trees.”

Coburn’s wish was thwarted.  Shortly before 1 a.m., Senator Byrd was wheeled into the Senate, eager to vote.  As his name was called, the West Virginia senator held up his right index finger as he shouted “aye”, then pumped his left fist in defiance.