Posts Tagged ‘House of Representatives’
Wednesday, February 17th, 2010
The rationale for healthcare reform is simple - cover most of the population and rein in rising costs. But what happens if healthcare reform isn’t enacted? The answer is not good.
“Failure to enact health reform will result in increasing numbers of people without health insurance because fewer employers will offer it and many employees will not be able to pay the cost of plans that are available,” says Stephen Zuckerman, a health economist at the Urban Institute think tank in Washington, D.C. “For people not offered employer coverage, many will not be able to get coverage due to pre-existing conditions that insurers won’t cover or because premiums won’t be affordable. Even people with coverage will find costs becoming a greater financial burden.”
The numbers are startling. Americans paid $2.5 trillion for healthcare in 2009, equal to 17.3 percent of the nation’s GDP. As the economy starts to grow again, so will healthcare costs. The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) estimates that without reform, healthcare will rise to 19.3 percent of the GDP by 2019. According to Urban Institute statistics, if healthcare reform is not enacted, the number of Americans without insurance will climb to 57 million or 20.1 percent of the population - and that is the best-case scenario.
The 16.5 percent of Americans now covered by Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program will rise to 18.3 percent. Medicare and Medicaid spending will cost approximately $725 billion in 2010, 50 percent more than Congress appropriates for all other domestic agencies. By 2014, the cost is projected to be $950 billion.
Inaction will only increase the budget deficit. Peter Orszag, the White House budget director, warns that “The fiscal course that we’re on, out in 2020 and 2030 and 2040, is unsustainable and needs to be addressed. If we don’t address rising healthcare costs, there’s nothing else that we’re going to be able to do that will alter that basic fact.”
Tags: Centers for Medicaid Services, Centers for Medicare, compromise, Congress, health economist, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, insurance premiums, Medicaid, Peter Orszag, pre-existing conditions, President Barack Obama, Senate, Stephen Zuckerman, think tank, Urban Institute
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010
President Barack Obama used his first State of the Union Address to tell members of the House and Senate to continue their efforts to enact healthcare reform. “As temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we’ve proposed,” the president said. “Not now. Not when we are so close. By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. I will not walk away from these Americans and neither should the people in this chamber.” The president’s comments won applause and ovations from both sides of the aisle.
Richard Umbdenstock, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association said “I think it’s the right approach.” Umbdenstock, who worked closely with the Obama administration to shape elements of healthcare reform legislation, said it was “important work” and “there is a real need to continue.” He also linked healthcare reform to the crucial issue of job creation, noting that “Hospitals are the second largest source of private sector jobs.”
Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) said “I think the House should just pass the Senate bill,” although he agreed that there likely will be efforts to amend the legislation through a procedure that allows passage on a simple majority vote. “But clearly the House can pass the Senate bill and the Senate’s bill is a good bill.”
“We all know we’ve been trying to get healthcare done since Teddy Roosevelt,” Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) commented on Wednesday. “So a few more weeks isn’t a long period of time in the context of how tough a fight this is when you go up against the special interest. We’ll do it and we’ll do it the right way.”
Tags: American Hospital Association, Chris Van Hollen, Democrats, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, President Barack Obama, Republicans, Richard Umbdenstock, Senate, Senator Barbara Boxer, Senator Bill Nelson, Senator Max Baucus, State of the Union Address, Teddy Roosevelt
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Monday, February 1st, 2010
Some Democrats think legislating in baby steps to achieve healthcare reform is their best option now that the party has lost its 60-vote super majority with Scott Brown’s upset victory in Massachusetts to fill Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat.
According to Representative Bill Pascrell, Jr., (D-NJ), some House Democrats are proposing an incremental approach to fix the healthcare system via multiple pieces of legislation instead of a single all-encompassing bill. The goal would remain to reform insurance coverage, assure patients’ rights and improve the way that healthcare is delivered. Pascrell envisions introducing three or four bills in quick succession. The legislation would encompass the least controversial elements of the broader reform package now stalled in Congress.
Pascrell believes that his measures might garner some Republican support because they would eliminate the public option, individual insurance mandates and entitlement programs. Pascrell notes that “You can blame the Senate all you want, but we are our own worst enemy. We do everything in mega-fashion. We need to do it in mini-fashion.”
Tags: 60 vote super majority, Bill Pascrell Jr, Democrats, entitlement programs, filibuster, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, individual insurance mandates, public option, Republicans, Scott Brown, Ted Kennedy
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Wednesday, January 13th, 2010
Representative John Dingell Jr.’s (D-MI) journey to making healthcare reform a reality dates back to 1932 when his father — John Dingell Sr., an architect of the New Deal — initially introduced Medicare legislation in the early days of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency. The 83-year-old Dingell Jr., is one of the lead sponsors of the House legislation that will be reconciled with the Senate bill in conference committee.
Dingell, who is the longest-ever serving member of the House of Representatives, has introduced a national health insurance bill on the first day of every Congressional session as a tribute to his father. After John Dingell, Sr. died in 1955, his son assumed his father’s Congressional seat and the quest to make national health insurance a reality.
Commenting on the Senate’s recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Dingell said that “I commend my colleagues in the Senate on achieving this historic milestone. The journey is long, but the reward will be great. Unlike any other time in our history, we have two strong pieces of comprehensive health reform legislation that promise to deliver much needed access and relief to the American people. When President Obama signs a final, combined bill, we will be well on our way to fulfilling our longstanding moral obligation — providing quality, affordable coverage for every American. However, as is usually the case with any major overhaul, this is the first step in the process, not the last.”
Tags: Franklin Roosevelt, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, John Dingell Jr, John Dingell Sr, Medicare, Michigan, National Institues of Health, New Deal
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 5th, 2010
The powerful Service Employees International Union (SEIU) has blasted Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) for his opposition to making Medicare available to Americans aged 55 - 64 as part of healthcare reform. SEIU strongly supports the expansion of Medicare, a move that Lieberman supported as recently as last September.
According to Andy Stern, SEIU president, “We have a handful of senators who think their point of view is so essential that they can stop progress. We think it’s time to take a vote, let the chips fall where they may.”
Stern expressed hope that some of the union’s healthcare reform objectives will be resolved in conference committee, which ultimately will resolve the Senate and House versions of the legislation.
Tags: Andy Stern, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, Joseph Lieberman, Medicare, SEIU, Senate
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009
Conservative Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer wants to toss both the House of Representatives’ and Senate’s healthcare reform bills and start from scratch. His primary objection to the legislation is that “it wildly compounds the complexity by adding hundreds of new provisions, regulations, mandates, committees and other arbitrary bureaucratic inventions. Worse, they are packed into a monstrous package without any regard to each other. The only think linking these changes - such as the 118 new boards, commissions and programs - is political expediency. Each must be able to garner just enough votes to pass. There is not even a pretense of a unifying vision or conceptual harmony.”
Rather, Krauthammer’s vision of healthcare reform centers primarily on tort reform, which he estimates wastes half a trillion dollars every year - primarily dollars going into the legal system. The rest, according to Krauthammer, is wasted on millions of unnecessary tests, procedures and referrals whose sole purpose is to avoid lawsuits. Krauthammer also advocates for individuals being able to purchase healthcare insurance across state lines, which he says will increase competition and reduce premiums. Nine states have one insurer covering 70 percent of the people (in Alabama, it’s 83 percent).
According to Krauthammer, the next step is to “Tax employer-provided health insurance. This is an accrued inefficiency of 65 years, an accident of World War II wage controls. It creates a $250 billion annual loss of federal revenue - the largest tax break for individuals in the entire federal budget” - even though that proposal is strongly opposed by labor unions.
Suggesting that the Democrats “have chosen the worst possible method”, Krauthammer says “The better choice is targeted measures that attack the inefficiencies of the current system one by one - tort reform, interstate purchasing and taxing employee benefits. It would take 20 pages to write such a bill, not 2,000 - and provide the funds to cover the uninsured without wrecking both U.S. healthcare and the U.S. Treasury.”
Tags: Charles Krauthammer, conservative, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, Senate, tort reform
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Declaring that “failure is not an option” on healthcare reform, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said that the legislation will be passed with or without Republican support. “We’re not going to not pass a bill,” Schumer said, pointing to a healthcare system that is broken because some 47 million Americans lack any kind of insurance coverage.
Before this can happen, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has the task of resolving issues within his own party regarding abortion, taxes and allowing the government to sell health insurance in competition with private insurers. Democratic leaders are working to persuade Senator Olympia Snow (R-ME) to cross party lines and vote in favor of the ultimate bill, even though she sided with her fellow Republicans on the recent procedural vote to move the debate to the full Senate floor.
Both the Senate and House of Representatives bills require all Americans to have healthcare insurance, and plan to make government subsidies available to help pay premiums. Insurance companies would be banned from denying coverage or charging extra for individuals with pre-existing conditions. New insurance marketplaces would be created for those Americans who have difficulty finding affordable coverage - such as the self-employed and those who own small businesses. Americans who currently have employer-provided coverage won’t see any big changes in their coverage. Senior citizens will see improvement in their prescription coverage.
As for paying for these bills? The House bill depends primarily on an income tax hike on upper-income individuals. The Senate bill would tax Cadillac insurance plans, increase the Medicare payroll tax for the wealthy and mandate fees on medical industries.
Tags: Blue Dog Democrats, Cadillac insurance plans, Democrats, Healthcare, House of Representatives, Medicaid, Medicare, President Barack Obama, public option, Republican, Senate, Senator Ben Nelson, Senator Blanche Lincoln, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Olympia Snowe
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 8th, 2009
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is warning that the healthcare reform bill may not pass until after the New Year. According to Reid, debate in the Senate may not begin until December, pushing back the timeline on legislation that tops President Barack Obama’s domestic agenda.
Meanwhile, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) says that the House of Representatives is on a faster track and that a vote could come soon on a bill to extend coverage to people who lack healthcare insurance, ban industry practices such as denying coverage of pre-existing conditions and put the brakes on medical spending. The $1.2 trillion, 10-year bill would expand coverage to an estimated 96 percent of all Americans. Additionally, the House bill includes a public option intended to put pressure on private insurers to make coverage more affordable for all.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) currently is working on a cost estimate for the draft bill that Reid submitted recently. White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer reacted to the news by saying “The House plans to vote on the health reform bill within days. Senator Reid has committed to the president that as soon as the Senate has the information back from the CBO they will move expeditiously to pass health reform.”
A delay past the year-end timetable would push off healthcare reform to a mid-term election year and raise questions about the Democrats’ ability to deliver legislation that the Obama administration has made a priority.
Tags: Congressional Budget Office, House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, Obama administration, Senate, Senator Harry Reid
Posted in Healthcare, Hospital Systems | No Comments »
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

The public’s support for the public option in healthcare reform is on the upswing, as the Senate debates whether to include such a plan in the ultimate healthcare overhaul bill. According to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, fully 57 percent of Americans favor a public option, a rise from the 52 percent reported in August. Even so, the statistic is below the 62 percent approval rating the public option received in June.
At present, the Senate is working to reconcile the Finance Committee’s healthcare bill and the Health Committee’s legislation. Only the Health Committee’s legislation includes a public option, which President Obama favors but has said is not a requirement. The public option is a bone of contention in the healthcare reform process, and has strong opposition from Republicans who believe it could drive private insurers from the marketplace and result in a single-payer system.
Patients First, a conservative group, believes the poll’s methodology is flawed. According to Phil Kerpen, the group’s policy director, “The poll is a mirage designed to create the illusion of a groundswell of support for government-forced healthcare when no such support exists. The poll reflects the political aspirations of a few peddlers of failed big-government ideas, not the common sense wishes of the American people.”
President Obama has said he wants to sign healthcare reform legislation by Christmas.
Tags: healthcare reform, House of Representatives, Patients First, President Barack Obama, public option, Senate, Senate Finance Committee, Senate Health Committee, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Max Baucus
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Monday, November 30th, 2009
Corporate giants like Verizon, JPMorgan, General Electric and Wal-Mart are lining up in opposition to the inclusion of a public option in healthcare reform legislation now under consideration in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Business Roundtable, comprised of large companies that in aggregate employ more than 12 million Americans, accuse the federal government of inefficiency and charge that it would underpay healthcare providers. Additionally, the Business Roundtable claims that a public option will increase prices for private insurers and employers.
By contrast, President Barack Obama believes that a government alternative will force private insurers to offer more competitive pricing. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said his bill includes a public option that is an alternative to policies sold by private insurers. States will have the ability to opt out from offering the plan.
“A public plan would neither manage cost nor encourage innovation,” said Antonio Perez, chief executive of Eastman Kodak and head of the Business Roundtable’s healthcare group. “We believe it is the wrong direction for fixing our healthcare system.” Other business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are sponsoring national television ads in seven states opposing the public option. The chamber prefers a national exchange “with an Orbitz-like website” that compares deals offered by various private providers.
Tags: Business Roundtable, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, President Barack Obama, public option, Senate, Senator Harry Reid, US Chamber of Commerce
Posted in Healthcare | 2 Comments »