Posts Tagged ‘legislation’

Representative Alan Grayson Takes On the Republican Healthcare Reform Plan

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Florida Congressman Alan Grayson says Republican healthcare reform plan is “don’t get sick.”  Although he’s only a freshman Congressman, Representative Alan Grayson (D-FL) has strong feelings on healthcare reform legislation – and he’s not afraid to make his thoughts known.  Grayson, whose central Florida swing district includes Orlando, has seen his national profile rise after he described the Republican healthcare plan as one that would require the sick to “die quickly”. Grayson went on to apologize to the dead and their families for not moving more quickly to enact healthcare reform.

Defending himself on CNN’s “The Situation Room”, Grayson told Wolf Blitzer, “What I mean is that they have got no plan.  Where is the Republican plan?  We’re all waiting to see something that will take care of the pre-existing conditions, to take care of the 40 million Americans who have no coverage at all.  That’s what I meant when I said that the Republican plan is don’t get sick.  And if you do get sick, die quickly.”  Grayson later apologized to Congressional Republicans.

Grayson cited a Harvard University study that found that 44,000 Americans die annually because they lack healthcare insurance.  He asked for bipartisanship “to do our jobs for the sake of those dying people and their families.  I apologize to the dead and their families that we haven’t voted sooner to end this holocaust in America.”

Calling for universal healthcare, Grayson criticized “whoever it is that’s causing the Republicans to fight tooth-and-nail against anything, absolutely anything, to have every vote come down to being 257 – 175 in the House, over and over and over again.  Those are the people who are really disserving Americans.”

How Much Will That MRI Cost? Depends on Who You Ask

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

Price transparency may be one welcome element in healthcare reform legislation. The proposed bipartisan bill written by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) and his Senate Finance Committee includes a provision that will require hospitals to list standard charges for their services.healthcare-cost

As the system currently works, insurance companies enter into agreements with hospitals and physicians to determine how much they will pay for hip replacement surgeries, cataract procedures and MRIs — all long before the patient enters the scene.  Hospitals and doctors tend to charge the uninsured significantly higher rates than they do the insured.  Medicare sets its own rates, which typically are lower than commercial rates.

“The pricing model is ridiculous,” said Brad Myers, a founder of Pensacola, FL-based NewChoiceHealth, Inc., an online tool that allows consumers to compare healthcare prices.  Myers bases his information on estimates gleaned from Medicare data.

The states of Maine and New Hampshire have addressed this partially with online cost comparison websites that are accurate because they are based on insurance claims paid for real procedures.  Consumers can use the information posted to shop around or to get the best deal possible.  A visit to the Maine website finds that one hospital charges the uninsured $1,326 for a colonoscopy.  The insured pay the hospital between $800 and $950 for the same procedure, depending on who carries their coverage.  Medicare pays the same hospital just $793.

Senate Advances on Reshaping Healthcare Coverage

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

A crucial Senate committee has approved legislation to reform the nation’s healthcare system.  This is significant because it marks the first time the committee has acted on legislation to fulfill President Obama’s goal of reshaping how healthcare is paid for in the United States.s-obamated-large

Specifically, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee voted 13 – 10 — along strict party lines — to endorse a $600 billion measure to expand coverage to virtually all Americans by requiring individuals to get insurance with their employers contributing to the cost.  If enacted into law, the legislation would provide federal aid to families and individuals who make less than four times the poverty level – approximately $88,000 for a family of four.

The committee’s chairman, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, missed the vote because of his ongoing treatment for brain cancer.  Even though Senator Kennedy is acting behind the scenes in the push to pass this legislation, he remains one of the prime movers for enacting healthcare reform.

The Loyal Opposition

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

The Republican National Committee’s (RNC) response to the Obama Administration’s and Congressional Democrats’ efforts to pass healthcare reform legislation was to sponsor a “Hillarycare revisited” fund raising effort.

The RNC warned against “Obamacare” and pointed out that the government “already run2008-08-23-dnc-081s car companies, banks and mortgage companies.  Republicans believe that the last thing the American people want is government telling them when and where – or even whether – they can get medical treatment for their families.”  “Hillarycare” refers to former President Bill Clinton’s failed attempt at reforming healthcare during the 1990s, an effort led by his wife, Hillary Clinton.

Republicans like John Boehner (R-OH) have raised the specter of a “bureaucrat standing between you and your doctor.”  Perhaps it’s worth considering that we currently have an insurance company bureaucrat performing the same role.  Also, government administered health options are almost uniformly popular.  The World Health Organization ranks France’s healthcare system as the world’s finest, contrasted to the United States, which scored 37th.  The United Kingdom’s combination of publicly and privately funded healthcare ranked 18th in the World Health Organization’s survey.

Democrats May Use “Nuclear Option” to Pass Healthcare Reform

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

The Obama administration is playing hardball to force Congress to pass healthcare reform legislation before the end of the year – preferably without the customary Republican-led filibuster delaying the final vote. obamahealthcare President Obama’s aggressive approach to protect healthcare legislation from Republican filibusters demonstrates the magnitude this ambitious reform package and has come to be called in some circles the nuclear option.

The agreement between the White House and Congressional Democrats lets healthcare legislation that meets budget targets win approval by a simple Senate majority — a process called reconciliation.  Not surprisingly, Republican leaders are up in arms about the no-filibuster deal, claiming that healthcare is too important to be exempt from the Senate’s usual rules.

Republicans have threatened to use their own procedural weapons to bog down the Senate if the Democrats try to restrict filibusters.  Options include forcing multiple votes on routine bills, inaction on administration nominations, or requiring lengthy legislation to be read in full.  Even some Democrats – notably Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Max Baucus of Montana – are uncomfortable with reconciliation.  Other Democrats point out that Senate Republicans successfully used reconciliation to enact President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

The president is relying on his significant political capital to push his agenda through, relying on unwavering support from his sizable Senate Democratic majority.  This is likely to total 60 Senators once the Minnesota courts finally certify Al Franken’s victory, and as a result of Arlen Specter’s surprise exit from the Republican Party. That could give President Obama the filibuster-proof majority he wants.