Posts Tagged ‘public option’
Monday, May 3rd, 2010
Lost in the war of words about healthcare reform is a series of initiatives intended to prevent disease and promote healthier behavior. Under the new law, for example, chain restaurants will be required to provide nutrition information on their menus; nursing mothers must be given “reasonable break time” by their employers.
Americans on Medicare will be given free yearly “wellness” physicals to assess their overall condition and screen for symptoms of Alzheimer’s Disease. Medicaid will cover drugs and counseling to help pregnant women stop smoking. Additionally, a new federal trust fund will pay for bicycle paths, playgrounds, sidewalks and hiking trails to encourage exercise. These are just a few of the many provisions Congress added to the healthcare reform bill to reduce preventable diseases - and which ultimately could save the government money.
According to John R. Sefrin, chief executive of the American Cancer Society, the new law will save lives because more people will be screened for diseases like breast and colon cancer. “When people have insurance, they are much more likely to receive screenings and treatment. And they are more likely to seek screenings when they do not have to pay co-payments or deductibles.” These screenings mean that diseases like cancer might be detected earlier when they are more easily treatable.
Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) and chairman of the Senate health committee, points out that “we don’t have a healthcare system in America. We have a sick care system. If you get sick, you get care. But precious little is spent to keep people healthy in the first place.”
Tags: Alzheimer's Disease, American Cancer Society, Congress, Food and Drug Administration, health insurance companies, healthcare reform, healthy behavior, Kathleen Sebelius, Medicaid, Medicare, President Barack Obama, public option, wellness
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 20th, 2010
When President Lyndon Johnson signed Medicare into law on July 30, 1965, he faced a year of nearly crippling attacks from groups like the American Medical Association (AMA) and conservatives who feared an onslaught of “socialized medicine” and threatened to boycott the new program. Although memories of the Medicare battle have faded over 45 years, similar battles could be fought over the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This is the opinion of Dr. Atul Gawande, general and endocrine surgeon at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Associate Professor of Surgery at Harvard Medical School.
Writing in The New Yorker, Gawande notes that because most of the healthcare reform act’s provisions phase in at a slower pace than did Medicare, it is even more open to attack. “The context, of course, is different. The AMA endorsed the legislations; hospital associations were supportive. Once the public option was dropped, most insurers favored the bill. The medical world will wage no civil resistance. This time, the threat comes from party politics. Conservatives are casting the November midterm elections as a vote on repealing the health-reform law. If they regain power, they are unlikely to repeal the whole thing. Instead, they will try to strip out the critical but less straightforwardly appealing elements of reform - the requirement that larger employers provide health benefits and that uncovered individuals buy at least a basic policy; the subsidies to make sure that they can afford those policies; the significant new taxes on household incomes over $250,000 - and thereby gut coverage for the uninsured.”
Gawande notes that reform is hardly a government takeover of healthcare, as many opponents contend. Rather, its success relies on communities and clinicians. “We are the ones to determine whether costs are controlled and healthcare improves - which is to say, whether reform survives and resistance is defeated,” according to Gawande. “The voting is over, and the country has many other issues that clamor for attention. But, as L.B.J. would have recognized, the battle for healthcare reform has only begun.”
Tags: American Medical Association, Atul Gawande, conservatives, Harvard Medical School, Medicare, President Barack Obama, public option, socialized medicine, The New Yorker
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, has warned insurance companies to stop hunting for loopholes as a way to get around complying with healthcare reform. Additionally, Sebelius intends to write regulations to assure that all insurers cover children with pre-existing conditions, even though some companies are adamant that this is not one of the new law’s requirements.
“The American people debated and discussed health insurance reform for more than a year. Congress and the President have acted. Now is not the time to search for non-existent loopholes that preserve a broken system,” Sebelius wrote in a letter to insurance industry lobbyist Karen Ignagni.
President Obama stressed the ban on denying children with pre-existing conditions as a focus of his argument during the reform fight. His position is that children should be protected almost immediately after the bill becomes law - in this case, next September. The insurance companies claim they don’t have to cover children with pre-existing conditions until 2014.
The insurers’ revolt over this presumed loophole could mean that progressive Democrats will reconsider adding a robust public option to the law. The insurance companies’ threat to turn down sick kids makes the case to include a public option significantly more credible.
Tags: Congress, Democrats, healthcare reform legislation, insurance companies, Karen Ignagni, Kathleen Seblius, President Barack Obama, Progressive Party, public option
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Monday, March 15th, 2010
Two Democratic Congressmen - Representatives Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and Bart Stupak (D-MI) - may torpedo President Barack Obama’s efforts to reform the way healthcare is delivered in the United States. Both Congressmen are threatening to cross party lines and vote with House Republicans, who are united in their solid opposition to healthcare reform.
Kucinich justifies his “no” vote on the fact the legislation lacks a robust public option - a provision that the Republicans staunchly oppose - and describes the bill as a “giveaway” to the insurance companies. Republicans have called on the president to dump the bill, saying it is too expensive, complicated and burdensome on businesses and individuals who will be required to buy healthcare insurance, often with government subsidies.
Stupak is threatening to vote to defeat healthcare reform for an entirely different reason. His objection is that the legislation might allow federal funds to be used to reimburse patients for abortions. “Yes. We’re prepared to take responsibility,” Stupak said on “Good Morning America” when asked if he and 11 other Democrat were willing to accept the consequences for bringing down healthcare reform over abortion. “Let’s face it. I want to see healthcare. But we’re not going to bypass the principles of belief that we feel strongly about,” he said.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs reiterated that when it comes to this issue, the administration merely wants to maintain the status quo and believes that Stupak ultimately will be persuaded to vote with his fellow Democrats. “This is not a bill about abortion. This is about healthcare reform,” Gibbs said.
Tags: abortion, acceptable healthcare coverage, Bart Stupak, Congress, Dennis Kucinich, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, President Barack Obama, public option, Republicans, Robert Gibbs, Senate, Stupak Amendment
Posted in Healthcare | 1 Comment »
Monday, February 1st, 2010
Some Democrats think legislating in baby steps to achieve healthcare reform is their best option now that the party has lost its 60-vote super majority with Scott Brown’s upset victory in Massachusetts to fill Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat.
According to Representative Bill Pascrell, Jr., (D-NJ), some House Democrats are proposing an incremental approach to fix the healthcare system via multiple pieces of legislation instead of a single all-encompassing bill. The goal would remain to reform insurance coverage, assure patients’ rights and improve the way that healthcare is delivered. Pascrell envisions introducing three or four bills in quick succession. The legislation would encompass the least controversial elements of the broader reform package now stalled in Congress.
Pascrell believes that his measures might garner some Republican support because they would eliminate the public option, individual insurance mandates and entitlement programs. Pascrell notes that “You can blame the Senate all you want, but we are our own worst enemy. We do everything in mega-fashion. We need to do it in mini-fashion.”
Tags: 60 vote super majority, Bill Pascrell Jr, Democrats, entitlement programs, filibuster, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, individual insurance mandates, public option, Republicans, Scott Brown, Ted Kennedy
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Thursday, January 7th, 2010
Why did Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) threaten to filibuster and insist on dropping the public option and a Medicare buy-in for people aged 55 - 64 in the healthcare reform bill? Even more puzzling is the fact that Lieberman had supported a public option as recently as this past September. Lieberman, who may classify as a liberal, is pro-choice and supports some gay rights, angered Democrats in his home state of Connecticut when he openly campaigned for Republicans John McCain and Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election.
In The Guardian, Chris McGreal writes that “Now, in the view of some, he is plumbing new depths of betrayal by using his deciding vote as an independent member of the Senate to hold hostage Barack Obama’s reform of America’s dysfunctional healthcare system. Lieberman’s tactics have upset Democratic party members of Congress who are asking why a popular president’s agenda is being stalled by a senator who has repeatedly turned his back on his old party.”
Critics see Lieberman’s opposition to the public option as a result of his acceptance of approximately $1 million in campaign donations from the medical insurance industry - many of which are headquartered in his home state — over his 21-year Senate career. Lieberman’s wife, Hadassah, works for a lobbying firm as its health and pharmaceutical specialist. Her previous employers include big pharma companies Pfizer and Hoffmann-LaRoche. Lieberman’s supporters thought he was “genuinely an independent” who agrees “more often than not with Democrats on domestic policy. I agree more often than not with Republicans on foreign and defense policy,” Lieberman once told Fox News.
According to McGreal, “Detractors paint a picture of a vain, bitter man still stung by his rejection by Democratic voters who came close to scuppering his Senate career three years ago and now reveling in the power he wields to block Obama’s first piece of major legislation.” Lieberman says he is not acting out of spite. “That’s just poppycock,” he said. “If I had any sense of vendetta against the Democratic party, I wouldn’t be in the Democratic caucus today.”
Tags: filibuster, Hadassah Lieberman, healthcare reform, insurance industry, John McCain, Joseph Lieberman, pfizer, President Barack Obama, public option, Sarah Palin, Senate
Posted in Healthcare, Hospital Systems | No Comments »
Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Declaring that “failure is not an option” on healthcare reform, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said that the legislation will be passed with or without Republican support. “We’re not going to not pass a bill,” Schumer said, pointing to a healthcare system that is broken because some 47 million Americans lack any kind of insurance coverage.
Before this can happen, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has the task of resolving issues within his own party regarding abortion, taxes and allowing the government to sell health insurance in competition with private insurers. Democratic leaders are working to persuade Senator Olympia Snow (R-ME) to cross party lines and vote in favor of the ultimate bill, even though she sided with her fellow Republicans on the recent procedural vote to move the debate to the full Senate floor.
Both the Senate and House of Representatives bills require all Americans to have healthcare insurance, and plan to make government subsidies available to help pay premiums. Insurance companies would be banned from denying coverage or charging extra for individuals with pre-existing conditions. New insurance marketplaces would be created for those Americans who have difficulty finding affordable coverage - such as the self-employed and those who own small businesses. Americans who currently have employer-provided coverage won’t see any big changes in their coverage. Senior citizens will see improvement in their prescription coverage.
As for paying for these bills? The House bill depends primarily on an income tax hike on upper-income individuals. The Senate bill would tax Cadillac insurance plans, increase the Medicare payroll tax for the wealthy and mandate fees on medical industries.
Tags: Blue Dog Democrats, Cadillac insurance plans, Democrats, Healthcare, House of Representatives, Medicaid, Medicare, President Barack Obama, public option, Republican, Senate, Senator Ben Nelson, Senator Blanche Lincoln, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Olympia Snowe
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Wednesday, December 9th, 2009
Healthcare reform’s worst news could be former vice presidential candidate Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), who is threatening to join a Republican filibuster should a public option in any form be included in the final legislation. Senators possibly joining Lieberman in opposing a public option are Ben Nelson (D-NE), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA). Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is exploring compromise measures with his 60-member caucus.
So opposed is Lieberman that he has vowed to filibuster the ultimate bill if it contains any form of public option. This includes “the trigger” or “fallback” that is favored by Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME). Under this plan, the trigger would let states opt out of a public plan. Lieberman also opposes Senator Tom Carper’s (D-DE) “the hammer”, which would allow states to opt into a public plan. Blue Dog Democrats like Landrieu have expressed some support for both “the trigger” and “the hammer”.
Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) remains optimistic. “I think that what happens is there are two weeks, three weeks, whatever, of debate. Senator Lieberman, everybody gets a chance to offer amendments. I don’t want four Democratic senators dictating to the other 56 of us and to the country, when the public option has this much support, that it’s not going to be in it,” he said, noting that a majority of the American people support a public option. According to Brown, the four dissenters will “look at this bill in the end and say, I don’t think they want to be on the wrong side of history. I don’t think they want to go back and say, you know, on a procedural vote, ‘I killed the most important bill in my political career.’ I don’t think they want to be there on that. So I think in the end, we get them.”
Pat of the dilemma, the Democrats find themselves in is that two Democrats - Roland Burris and Bernie Sanders - have vowed not to vote for the bill if there’s no public option.
Tags: Blue Dog Democrats, filibuster, healthcare reform, Joe Lieberman, Mary Landrieu, Michael Steele, Olympia Snowe, President Barack Obama, public option, Senator Harry Reid, Tom Carper
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

The public’s support for the public option in healthcare reform is on the upswing, as the Senate debates whether to include such a plan in the ultimate healthcare overhaul bill. According to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, fully 57 percent of Americans favor a public option, a rise from the 52 percent reported in August. Even so, the statistic is below the 62 percent approval rating the public option received in June.
At present, the Senate is working to reconcile the Finance Committee’s healthcare bill and the Health Committee’s legislation. Only the Health Committee’s legislation includes a public option, which President Obama favors but has said is not a requirement. The public option is a bone of contention in the healthcare reform process, and has strong opposition from Republicans who believe it could drive private insurers from the marketplace and result in a single-payer system.
Patients First, a conservative group, believes the poll’s methodology is flawed. According to Phil Kerpen, the group’s policy director, “The poll is a mirage designed to create the illusion of a groundswell of support for government-forced healthcare when no such support exists. The poll reflects the political aspirations of a few peddlers of failed big-government ideas, not the common sense wishes of the American people.”
President Obama has said he wants to sign healthcare reform legislation by Christmas.
Tags: healthcare reform, House of Representatives, Patients First, President Barack Obama, public option, Senate, Senate Finance Committee, Senate Health Committee, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Max Baucus
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Monday, November 30th, 2009
Corporate giants like Verizon, JPMorgan, General Electric and Wal-Mart are lining up in opposition to the inclusion of a public option in healthcare reform legislation now under consideration in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Business Roundtable, comprised of large companies that in aggregate employ more than 12 million Americans, accuse the federal government of inefficiency and charge that it would underpay healthcare providers. Additionally, the Business Roundtable claims that a public option will increase prices for private insurers and employers.
By contrast, President Barack Obama believes that a government alternative will force private insurers to offer more competitive pricing. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said his bill includes a public option that is an alternative to policies sold by private insurers. States will have the ability to opt out from offering the plan.
“A public plan would neither manage cost nor encourage innovation,” said Antonio Perez, chief executive of Eastman Kodak and head of the Business Roundtable’s healthcare group. “We believe it is the wrong direction for fixing our healthcare system.” Other business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are sponsoring national television ads in seven states opposing the public option. The chamber prefers a national exchange “with an Orbitz-like website” that compares deals offered by various private providers.
Tags: Business Roundtable, healthcare reform, House of Representatives, President Barack Obama, public option, Senate, Senator Harry Reid, US Chamber of Commerce
Posted in Healthcare | 1 Comment »