Posts Tagged ‘Republican-led filibuster’

Could Olympia Snowe Be the Key Healthcare Reform?

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

olympia_snowe2The name Olympia Snowe (R-ME) has been prominent in the debate on healthcare reform –  and for good reason.  Snowe is the lone Republican member of the Senate Finance Committee who is still talking with Democrats to shape the ultimate bill.  This willingness to engage the opposition party gives Snowe significant leverage because she may provide the 60th vote that Democrats need to prevent a Republican filibuster.  In return, Snowe is likely to get what she wants in healthcare reform legislation — affordability.

Snowe’s perspective may be due to the fact that she represents a relatively poor state whose health insurance market is dominated by a single large firm that charges some of the country’s highest premiums.  Maine insurance costs are rising at nearly four times the rate of wages, hurting the small businesses that form the core of the state’s economy.

Even though Democrats are actively courting Snowe, her “yes” vote is not guaranteed.  She voted with Senate Finance Committee Republicans when they insisted that Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) submit his measure to the Congressional Budget Office to determine the bill’s price tag.  Additionally, Snowe was the sole member of Baucus’ bipartisan “Gang of Six” who complained that the federal subsidies included in the bill to help low- and middle-income people buy insurance were too small.  Baucus’ response was to increase the size of the subsidies.

Snowe’s most provocative input to the healthcare debate is her proposal for a trigger that would set in motion a Medicare-like, government-run public option to provide affordable coverage if private insurers don’t step up to the plate.  “It would be a safety net, a fallback mechanism,” Snowe says.  She points out that a similar idea was effective to stimulate competition in the Medicare prescription-drug program.

Democrats May Use “Nuclear Option” to Pass Healthcare Reform

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

The Obama administration is playing hardball to force Congress to pass healthcare reform legislation before the end of the year – preferably without the customary Republican-led filibuster delaying the final vote. obamahealthcare President Obama’s aggressive approach to protect healthcare legislation from Republican filibusters demonstrates the magnitude this ambitious reform package and has come to be called in some circles the nuclear option.

The agreement between the White House and Congressional Democrats lets healthcare legislation that meets budget targets win approval by a simple Senate majority — a process called reconciliation.  Not surprisingly, Republican leaders are up in arms about the no-filibuster deal, claiming that healthcare is too important to be exempt from the Senate’s usual rules.

Republicans have threatened to use their own procedural weapons to bog down the Senate if the Democrats try to restrict filibusters.  Options include forcing multiple votes on routine bills, inaction on administration nominations, or requiring lengthy legislation to be read in full.  Even some Democrats – notably Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Max Baucus of Montana – are uncomfortable with reconciliation.  Other Democrats point out that Senate Republicans successfully used reconciliation to enact President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

The president is relying on his significant political capital to push his agenda through, relying on unwavering support from his sizable Senate Democratic majority.  This is likely to total 60 Senators once the Minnesota courts finally certify Al Franken’s victory, and as a result of Arlen Specter’s surprise exit from the Republican Party. That could give President Obama the filibuster-proof majority he wants.