Posts Tagged ‘surgery’

Study Finds Need for More Operating Rooms Globally

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Poorest two billion only get four percent of OR time.  The richest two billion people in the world undergo 75 percent of all surgeries performed every year; by contrast, the poorest two billion have only four percent. This is one finding of a study published recently in the medical journal Lancet.  The study, performed by researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health, New Zealand, Canada and the World Health Organization, points out a need for additional ambulatory surgery facilities in the United States and across the globe.

The study found that many countries do not have enough surgeons to handle the simplest surgical procedures that improve lives – cataracts, tumors, auto accidents and the like.  Additionally, the researchers found instances of surgeons who lack access to usable operating rooms.  Throughout Africa, the study found that there was just a single operating room for every 100,000 people.  In the poorer Latin American nations, there were four to 10 operating rooms per 100,000.  That number rose to 15 in Western Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand.  Eastern Europe and the wealthier Asian nations reported approximately 25 ORs for every 100,000 people.

“Conservative estimates suggest that 11 percent of the world’s disability-adjusted life years are attributable to diseases that are often treated with surgery,” such as heart and cerebrovascular disease, cancer, and injuries resulting from traffic accidents, according to the authors, who were led by Luke M. Funk, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health.

At the same time, “the findings are consistent with other studies, and, for those familiar with overseas health work, believable,” Paul S. Myles, from Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, and Guy Haller, from the University of Geneva, Switzerland, wrote in an editorial accompanying the study. “The extent of the problem is now clearer: the solution is what needs much more work.”

The Checklist Manifesto

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Surgeon Atul Gawande believes that a simple checklist can cut deaths from operating room errors. Atul Gawande, general and endocrine surgeon at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Associate Professor of Surgery at Harvard Medical School, and columnist for The New Yorker, has written “The Checklist Manifesto:  How to Get Things Right”,  a book that describes how miscommunication in the operating room can lead to tragic results.  Currently, Gawande’s book ranks # 10 on the New York Times’ list of best-selling non-fiction books.

The book grew out of work Gawande did for the World Health Organization, which asked him to help them find a way to reduce surgical deaths.  According to Gawande, “We knew we had technology and incredible levels of training, people working unbelievably hard.  But we have more than 100,000 deaths just in the United States following surgery.  Half are avoidable, from our studies.  What could we do?  We have found this idea, this extra tool that others were using in aviation, in skyscraper construction, and thought, well, let’s give it a try.”

Surgeons, according to Gawande, are human.  “We miss stuff.  We are inconsistent and unreliable because of the complexity of care.”  To achieve better results, Gawande brings a simple checklist into the operating room to make certain that everything is in place to assure a successful procedure.  For example, when the operating team is introduced to each other by name, the average number of complications and deaths fell by 35 percent.

Commenting on the success of checklist use in the operating room, Gawande says “I have not gotten through a week of surgery where the checklist has not caught a problem.”

How Much Will That MRI Cost? Depends on Who You Ask

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

Price transparency may be one welcome element in healthcare reform legislation. The proposed bipartisan bill written by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) and his Senate Finance Committee includes a provision that will require hospitals to list standard charges for their services.healthcare-cost

As the system currently works, insurance companies enter into agreements with hospitals and physicians to determine how much they will pay for hip replacement surgeries, cataract procedures and MRIs — all long before the patient enters the scene.  Hospitals and doctors tend to charge the uninsured significantly higher rates than they do the insured.  Medicare sets its own rates, which typically are lower than commercial rates.

“The pricing model is ridiculous,” said Brad Myers, a founder of Pensacola, FL-based NewChoiceHealth, Inc., an online tool that allows consumers to compare healthcare prices.  Myers bases his information on estimates gleaned from Medicare data.

The states of Maine and New Hampshire have addressed this partially with online cost comparison websites that are accurate because they are based on insurance claims paid for real procedures.  Consumers can use the information posted to shop around or to get the best deal possible.  A visit to the Maine website finds that one hospital charges the uninsured $1,326 for a colonoscopy.  The insured pay the hospital between $800 and $950 for the same procedure, depending on who carries their coverage.  Medicare pays the same hospital just $793.

Insurer Preauthorization Doesn’t Guarantee Payment for $148,000 Back Surgery

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

balancing-a-checkbook-paying-billsHere’s a story that illustrates one way that our healthcare delivery system is broken.  Michael Napientek has been through healthcare insurance hell – and survived the ordeal. Last fall, the doorman underwent back surgery after obtaining a preauthorization number for payment from his insurance company.  Napientek’s health insurance is provided by his wife Sandie’s employer, Accelerated Health Systems.  The policy is a self-insured plan funded by Accelerated Health Systems, and which is administered by Wausau, WI-based UMR, a UnitedHealthcare subsidiary.

Imagine the Napienteks’ surprise when bills totaling $148,000 started appearing in their mailbox.  The insurer was refusing to pay for the surgery, even though it had preauthorized the procedure.  Three appeals against the claim were denied on the grounds that Napientek had not exhausted all means of pain relief.  Sandie Napientek complained to a UMR representative and was told that preauthorization did not guarantee payment because they had not provided documents that proved the “appropriateness” of the surgery.

Frustrated, the Napienteks turned to the Chicago Tribune’s “What’s Your Problem?” columnist Jon Yates to see if he could intervene.  Yates contacted UMR, who referred him to United Healthcare.  The Napienteks’ next communication from UMR was a letter saying it would pay the entire $148,000.  According to the letter, UMR changed its mind “based on additional information submitted and the opinion of an independent physician.”

This story represents a classic example of an insurance company bureaucrat standing between the patient and his physician – after preapproved surgery had been performed.