Posts Tagged ‘auction’

Watergate Hotel Relegated to White Elephant Status

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

watergate01The Watergate Hotel - the site where the “third-rate burglary” that sparked the biggest political scandal in American history and brought down Richard M. Nixon’s presidency was plotted — is now a distressed commercial property that failed to find a buyer at a much-anticipated auction.

The 251-room hotel, with its spectacular views of the Potomac River, was taken back by its owner, PB Capital, a subsidiary of Deutsche Postbank AG after no bidders expressed interest in purchasing and rehabbing the property in an auction held by Alex Cooper Auctioneers.  Monument Realty, which in 2004 bought the 12-story hotel with financing from the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers, owes PB Capital $44.3 million and is in default on the property.  In addition to paying off the loan, the new owner would have to rehab the Watergate, which has been closed for several years.  Built in 1967, the legendary hotel needs an estimated $100 million in renovations to bring it up to 21st-century standards.

David Furman, an attorney with Gibson Dunne, is not surprised that the hotel did not interest bidders.  “Lenders usually win in these kinds of auctions because they have the ability to credit bid the full amount of their loan.  There is usually a negotiated settlement before or after the auction.  It is rare that there is an upset at a foreclosure sale.”

According to Monument principal Michael Darby, he has commitments from new investors to restore the Watergate as a five-star hotel.  Another developer, Robert Holland, wants to buy the Watergate and is in talks with the United Arab Emirates-based luxury hotel chain, Jumeirah, to operate it.

Back to the Futures? Not Just Yet. Investors Still Spooked by Derivatives

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

It’s no surprise that investors are still wary of investing in derivatives, given the financial devastation that these vehicles’ collapse caused last year.  Proof of the fact is that the IPO of a financial instrument designed to be on American home prices failed because its auction did not generate adequate investor interest.51916680SC005_NYSE

According to its Securities and Exchange Commission filing, MacroMarkets turned down all auction bids because there was an “insufficient demand for an equal number of Down and Up shares”.  In other words, MacroMarkets was forced to abandon the auction process because the offering would work only if there was an equal number of shares in both the “up” and the “down” trusts - and if each pair of shares totaled $50.  The firm had initially set a minimum closing investment pool of $125 million, though CEO Sam Masucci did not disclose the value of the bids received before pulling the plug.

MacroMarkets sought out investment from homebuilders and banks who want to hedge their housing exposure, as well as foreign investors seeking a stake in U.S. real estate.  The problem is that investors had difficulty valuing the shares because it meant predicting the movement of the 10-city index on which the offering was based.  That’s not easy in a housing market where prices may not have bottomed out yet.

When housing trusts eventually restart, their shares will trade under the symbols UMM for “up” and DMM for “down” on the NYSE Arca, the New York Stock Exchange’s all-electronic U.S. trading platform.