Posts Tagged ‘Citigroup’

TARP Banks Lending on the Rise

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Lending by banks that received TARP assistance rose 13 percent in December.  Eleven American banks that received money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) originated 13 percent more loans in December than they had the previous month. The Department of the Treasury released this information in its monthly survey of loans made by recipients of the $700 billion government bailout money.

According to the Treasury Department, total loan balances fell one percent during the same timeframe.  This report does not include statistics from banks that repaid their TARP funds in June of 2009; future reports will not include data from banks that are exiting the TARP program.

A total of $178.1 billion in new loans was made during December, according to the Treasury.  Bank of America led the pack in originating loans, with $64.6 billion, an 11 percent increase over November.  Wells Fargo & Company occupied second place with a six percent increase, reporting $58.3 billion in new loans.  Citigroup lent $16.3 billion, an 11 percent increase.

Hedge Fund Honcho’s Bet Pays Off Big

Monday, February 1st, 2010

David Tepper’s shopping trip for cheap Bank of America and Citigroup stocks a $7 billion windfall.  David Tepper’s shrewd bet that the nation would avoid a second Great Depression inspired him to buy bank shares at rock-bottom rates, a move that has earned his Appaloosa Management hedge fund an estimated $7 billion worth of profit during 2009.  Last winter, Tepper invested heavily in Bank of America stocks selling for $3 a share, as well as Citigroup, Inc. preferred stock, then priced at a bargain-basement $1 per share.

Tepper, a philanthropist who funded the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, made a gamble that is paying off in a big way - surprising skeptics who insisted that he was making a costly error.  “I felt like I was alone,” Tepper said.  There were days when “no one was even bidding.”  An improving market has seen Appaloosa Management earn a 120 percent return.  As a result of those gains, Tepper now manages approximately $12 billion, making his company one of the world’s largest hedge funds.

In general, hedge funds had a bad year in 2008, when they experienced a 19 percent decline.  Approximately 1,500 funds - 16 percent of the total - went out of business in 2008.  The funds had a far better year in 2009.  According to Hedge Fund Research, Inc., they are seeing a 19 percent return, the best annual gains in 10 years.

Alan Shealy, a long-time Tepper client, says “Investing with David is like flying, with hours of boredom followed by bouts of sheer terror.  He’s the quintessential opportunist, investing in any asset class, but you have to have a cast-iron stomach.”

Czar Kenneth Feinberg Wants Across-the-Board Executive Pay Cuts

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Pay czar Ken Feinberg thinks Wall Street executives make too much money.  Compensation czar Kenneth Feinberg - officially, the Obama administration’s special master for executive compensation - believes that the pay reductions he mandated at seven taxpayer-rescued firms should become the model  for Wall Street and corporate America.

“There is entirely too much reliance on cash and there’s got to be a better way to tie corporate performance to long-term growth,” Feinberg said.  “I’m hoping that the methodology we developed to determine compensation for these individuals might be voluntarily adopted elsewhere.”  The Obama administration is holding unregulated risk-taking fueled by excessive pay partially responsible for the financial crisis, which has caused $1.6 trillion in losses and write-downs globally, as well as 7,200,000 jobs in the United States.  Between Feinberg’s ruling and Federal Reserve guidelines for banker compensation, the government has inserted itself directly into decisions normally made by corporate boards.

Feinberg has restructured cash “guarantees” into stock that the recipients must hold over the “long term”, according to a statement from the Treasury Department.  “Guaranteed minimum amounts give employees little downside risk in the event of poor performance - but upside when times are good.”

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve has proposed new guidelines on pay practices at that nation’s banks and plans to review the 28 biggest firms to assure that compensation packages don’t create incentives that lead to the risky investments that caused the worst financial crisis in 70 years.

Central Banks Tighten the Purse Strings A Little

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

The world’s central banks are easing up slightly on the generosity they have shown over the past year when the financial crisis threatened to destroy the global economy. After European Central Bank president Jean-Claude Trichet said his bank would withdraw some liquidity operations, the euro rose.  Similarly the pound went up after the Bank of England started purchasing bonds at a slower rate.  The Federal Reserve detailed the conditions in which it would raise interest rates - though it hasn’t acted on that yet.Central banks take initial steps to see if global economies can thrive without being propped up.

Juergen Michels, chief European economist at Citigroup, Inc., in London, says that “As soon as the first exit measures are put in place, there’s the risk that the market overreacts.  We’ll probably see a tightening of financing conditions, and hard-fought-for improvements will be in jeopardy.”

These actions mean that investors will have to operate without the liquidity that has been propping up the world’s economies, even as new concerns about additional asset bubbles grow.  Mistiming the withdrawal of support could spoil the fragile recovery.  Central banks are changing course at a time when factories are restocking inventories, and the price of commodities like gold and sugar are climbing.  The MSCI All-Countries World Index has soared 66 percent since March and sugar has increased 90 percent this year.

“There are all kinds of risks,” said Jim O’Neill, chief global economist at Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., in London.  “We don’t know how much of the improvement in markets is due to the central banks’ largesse, and neither do they.  They’re pretty nervous, but they’ve got to get out of it at some stage.”

A Rebound in Offshore Activity Signals India’s Recovery

Monday, November 16th, 2009

call-centers-india_26A report by India’s Economic Times indicates that up to 11 multinational firms including Wells Fargo, Standard Chartered and Ingersoll Rand set up back office facilities in India during the 3rd quarter of 2009.

A research firm, Everest Group, says this bodes well for the overall business momentum in India picking up in 2010.  Two of the reasons cited for India’s resurgence are the depreciation of the Indian currency and the reduction in operating costs which have enticed outsourcing operations back.

Although there was movement of outsourcing projects to facilities in Latin America and Southeast Asia, India continues to dominate the scene in the third quarter.

The new numbers signal a shift away from the doldrums of the first part of 2009.  Many U.S. firms like GE and CitiGroup put expansion plans and capital projects on hold due to the deteriorating financial ratios.

Jacob Cherian is AlterNow’s India Contributor. He is a business writer for Offshore Advisor.

Fed Proposing to Take a Hard Line on Bank Executive Pay

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Fed Proposing to Take a Hard Line on Bank Executive PayThe Federal Reserve is considering regulating banks’ pay policies to make certain they discourage employees from making the irresponsible gambles that led to 2008’s financial meltdown.  The Fed’s proposal would apply to thousands of banks, including some that did not receive bailouts.

Under the Fed’s proposal, the central bank would review - and could say “no” - to pay policies that might result in excessive risk-taking by executives, traders or loan officers.  The move marks the Fed’s most recent response to critics who say it didn’t crack down on lax lending, reckless risk taking and other practices that led to the great recession.  If the proposal is adopted, the 28 largest banks would develop internal plans to assure that compensation doesn’t start a new round of disproportionate risk taking.  Although the Fed declined to identify which banks would be required to submit plans, it’s safe to say that Citigroup, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company will be on that list.

“Compensation practices at some banking organizations have led to misaligned incentives and excessive risk-taking, contributing to bank losses and financial instability,” says Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.  “The Federal Reserve is working to ensure that compensation packages appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not create undue risk for the firm or the financial system.”

The key concept here is that of moral hazard - creating a correlation between performance and remuneration so that people are always compelled to act in the general interest.

One Year After Financial Meltdown, Obama Counsels Caution

Monday, September 21st, 2009

On the first anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the onset of the global financial crisis,  President Barack Obama used a Wall Street speech to call for stringent new regulation of United States markets.  After Lehman’s collapse, the American government infused billions of dollars into the financial system and took major stakes in Wall Street’s most famous names.  Although this action stabilized the system, it could not forestall a shrinking economy or the highest unemployment rate in 26 years.lehmanbros

“We can be confident that the storms of the past two years are beginning to break,” he said.  As the economy begins a “return to normalcy,” Obama said, “normalcy cannot lead to complacency.”

Lobbyists, lawmakers and even regulators so far have opposed proposals to more closely monitor the financial system. The five biggest banks - Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Bank of America - posted second-quarter 2009 profits totaling $13 billion.  That is more than twice their profits in the second quarter of 2008 and nearly two-thirds as much as the $20.7 billion they earned in the same timeframe two years ago - a time when the economy was considered strong.

Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is the point man for formulating new rules.  President Obama wants stricter capital requirements for banks to prevent them from purchasing exotic financial products without keeping adequate cash on hand.  It was precisely this type of behavior that caused last year’s financial crisis.

Michael Jackson’s Finances Illustrate Investor Over-exuberance

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

The tragic death of the “King of Pop” provides an interesting insight into how hedge funds and private equity groups buy loans  in anticipation of future earnings. Michael Jackson made real money during his 40 years as an entertainer; unfortunately, he also lost a lot of money, especially over the last 10 years.1df5e0555199fd3d53bd84a1e6ab4

Reports are that Jackson died $500 million in debt.  The crushing debt-service payments - combined with losses totaling millions, due to bad investments and money spent to finance his lifestyle - wiped out his fortune and he ended up in hot water with private equity creditors (it should be noted that Jackson was an extraordinary philanthropist, donating $300 million to a multitude of charities during his career.)

In 2003, Fortress Investment Group purchased some of Jackson’s loans from the Bank of America.  Jackson’s failure to repay caused Fortress to threaten to call in the loans.  Citigroup rode to the rescue and refinanced $300 million of Jackson’s debt.  After he fell behind on payments, Fortress moved to foreclose on the Neverland Ranch.  Yet another potential savior - Colony Capital - purchased his loans from Fortress and created a joint venture with Jackson to purchase Neverland for $22 million and renovate it for sale.  Colony was also backing Jackson’s 50-concert London comeback which had $85 million in sold-out ticket sales at the time of his death.  Clearly, Jackson’s brand was perceived to be so valuable (he sold 750 million albums during his career) that the assumption of risk was deemed to be worth it.

Nothing Succeeds Like Success

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Tuesday, March 10’s 379.44 stock market spike - the best finish since Thanksgiving - came on the heels of Citigroup, Inc.’s news that it had made a healthy profit during the first two months of 2009.  At the end of the day, the stock market had soared to a 6,926.49 close.

man-with-cigarSo, what did it?  It wasn’t a bold move by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.  It wasn’t the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  It wasn’t hope.  It wasn’t a government plan.

The catalyst that triggered the 5.8 percent Dow Jones Industrial Average stock market rise was honest-to-God good news.  The revelation was in the form of a leaked memo written by Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit stating that the banking giant had enjoyed its best financial performance in more than a year.  The memo, written to reassure the bank’s employees about its stability, said that Citigroup had recorded an operating profit of $8.3 billion before taxes and special items through the end of February.  This was Citigroup’s best performance since the third quarter of 2007 and puts it into a sound cash position.

The memo did not detail what the special items involved, but they could include credit losses and writedowns.  Still, the news kicked off a buying frenzy.  Worldwide financial stocks rose, with Citigroup up 38 percent for the day.

Broader indices like the Standard & Poors 500 index rose 43.07 to 719.60; NASDAQ soared 89.64 points to 1,358.28.

The Federal Government Takes First Steps to Bail Out Banks

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

The Treasury Department is spending the first $250 billion of the $700 billion rescue bill that Congress recently approved in an attempt to defuse the financial crisis that has dominated the headlines for weeks.  According to a recent article on GlobeSt.com, the move - which partially nationalizes the banking system - is seen by some as conflicting with the free-market principles that typically have characterized the American economy. To shore up the United States banking system, the Treasury Department is partially nationalizing nine banks by using $125 billion to purchase minority stakes in major financial institutions.  Although the banks haven’t been named, they are believed to include Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.  The Treasury Department is also expected to make the remaining $125 billion available to banks and thrifts across the country to purchase their preferred shares.

According to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, “Today’s actions are not what we ever wanted to do, but are what we must do to restore confidence to our financial system.  The needs of the economy require that our financial institutions not take this new capital to hoard it, but to deploy it.”  Just weeks before the presidential election, outgoing President George W. Bush sees the move as a short-term measure.  “The government’s role will be limited and temporary.  These measures are not intended to take over the free market, but to preserve it,” Bush said.

The question now is whether the banks will use the capital as the government intends - lend it to businesses and consumers again - or will they use it to sweeten their own balance sheets?  The government, no doubt, intends to exert significant pressure on the institutions to loosen credit so that people can start buying big-ticket items like houses and cars again.