Posts Tagged ‘Federl Reserve’

Fed Proposing to Take a Hard Line on Bank Executive Pay

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Fed Proposing to Take a Hard Line on Bank Executive PayThe Federal Reserve is considering regulating banks’ pay policies to make certain they discourage employees from making the irresponsible gambles that led to 2008′s financial meltdown.  The Fed’s proposal would apply to thousands of banks, including some that did not receive bailouts.

Under the Fed’s proposal, the central bank would review – and could say “no” – to pay policies that might result in excessive risk-taking by executives, traders or loan officers.  The move marks the Fed’s most recent response to critics who say it didn’t crack down on lax lending, reckless risk taking and other practices that led to the great recession.  If the proposal is adopted, the 28 largest banks would develop internal plans to assure that compensation doesn’t start a new round of disproportionate risk taking.  Although the Fed declined to identify which banks would be required to submit plans, it’s safe to say that Citigroup, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company will be on that list.

“Compensation practices at some banking organizations have led to misaligned incentives and excessive risk-taking, contributing to bank losses and financial instability,” says Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.  “The Federal Reserve is working to ensure that compensation packages appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not create undue risk for the firm or the financial system.”

The key concept here is that of moral hazard – creating a correlation between performance and remuneration so that people are always compelled to act in the general interest.

Local Banks Facing Significant CRE Losses

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Toxic commercial real estate loans could create losses up to $100 billion for small and mid-size banks by the end of 2010 if the economy worsens.  According to a Wall Street Journal report – which applied the same criteria used by the federal government in its stress tests of 19 big banks — these institutions stand to lose up to $200 billion.  In that worst-case scenario, 600 small and mid-sized excedrin1banks could see their capital contract to levels that federal regulators consider troubling, possibly even surpassing revenues.  These losses would exceed home loan losses, which total approximately $49 billion.

The Journal, which based its analysis on data mined from banks’ filings with the Federal Reserve, are a grim reminder that the banking industry’s troubles are not confined to the 19 giants that have already completed the Treasury Department’s stress tests.  More than 8,000 lenders nationwide are feeling the dual impacts of the recession and commercial real estate slowdown.

The banks analyzed by the Journal include 940 bank-holding companies that filed financial statements with the Fed for the year ending December 31.  They range from large regional banks to mom-and-pop banks in small towns, as well as American-based subsidiaries of international banks.

Smaller banks are unlikely to appeal to bargain-hunting investors who are starting to recapitalize the industry’s giants.  As a result, these institutions must boost their capital by selling assets and making fewer loans – which could make the recession last even longer than anticipated.