Posts Tagged ‘International Monetary Fund’

Global Financial Reform Hits a Roadblock

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

Global financial reform efforts stalemated.  Two years after the global financial meltdown and collapse of Lehman Brothers, world leaders seem to have reached an impasse over crucial proposals designed to prevent the same devastating scenario from occurring in the future.  The stalemate is so serious that there may be little chance that needed changes will be made. Executives at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are disappointed with the slow movement and analysts warn that national interests could undercut badly needed real reforms.  Tension over currency rates is growing, and there is an increasing sense that major financial centers will create significantly different rules impacting their nation’s financial firms.  United States Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner prefers a more unified approach to financial reform.

“Urgent action is needed to arrest the disturbing trend toward unilateral moves,” wrote Institute of International Finance managing director Charles H. Dallara in a letter to IMF officials.  The IMF fears that the global overhaul does not fulfill its promise to insulate the world from a repeat of the financial crisis.  “The more we continue with the present system, the more likely we are to have a relapse,” said Jos Vials, the IMF’s financial counselor and head of its capital markets department.  “Unless we deal with these problems, we will not have a safer system.”

The major points of contention relate to identifying and regulating firms considered to be too big to fail and how to create a system for some companies to collapse without requiring government bailouts.  The IMF’s financial experts believe that companies must be allowed to fail so they do not pursue risky strategies in the confidence that the government will rescue them if they get into trouble.  The only way to create effective regulations is to retain the idea of a moral hazard.

Is CRE Seeing Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

First quarter bank returns for commercial real estate not as bad as once predicted.  As the 1st quarter 2010 numbers come in, banks across the country are still uneasy about the short-term outlook for commercial real estate – and their portfolios in particular.  At the same time, there is a growing sense that the potential for disaster has faded and that problems are being resolved.

In general, banks reported that troubled loan assets were moving through their books.  Older construction loans are being converted to term loans, which gives borrowers an opportunity to hang on when cash flow is sluggish.  At the same time, banks are reporting that new non-performing commercial real estate loans were coming in at a slower pace.  Some loans labeled as non-performing were moving into the real estate owned (REO) grouping, meaning that they will eventually be sold back into the marketplace.  The International Monetary Fund’s April 2010 Global Financial Stability Report offers a fairly optimistic point of view for bank losses in the near future, as anticipated write-downs on U.S. bank’s loan and securities books diminished in comparison to late last year.

“These improved short-term losses are due primarily to two factors.  First, signs of an improving economic environment have decreased loss expectations,” said Mark Fitzgerald, senior debt analyst for CoStar Group.  “Second, some write-downs have simply been pushed forward as external factors, including low interest rates, have enabled banks to push off distress into the future.  What are the implications for commercial real estate investors?  The banks supply approximately 50 percent of all debt capital to the sector, so lending capital could be constrained for some time.  However, there is a bright side.  If we continue to follow our current path, and distressed assets bleed slowly into the market over time, then healthy lenders may have enough capacity to meet low transaction volumes (especially with depressed pricing).  The large banks that have recently reported healthy earnings (primarily due to their trading and fixed-income operations) are a potential source of capital, and these banks have historically been under-allocated to commercial real estate compared to the overall banking sector.”

“The Giant Pool of Money”

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

$70 trillion dollars.  That’s all the money in the world, or to get technical, the subset of global dollarsavings known as fixed-income securities.  And it almost doubled from $36 trillion in just six years.  How did this happen?

The Federal Reserve presided over the creation of what we have learned (the hard way) is a monster of unregulated investment vehicles run amok, resulting in the global credit crisis.

In the words of National Public Radio’s international business reporter Adam Davidson, “What he (former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan) is saying is he’s going to keep the Fed Funds rate at the absurdly low level of one percent.  It tells every investor in the world:  you are not going to make any money at all on U.S. treasury bonds for a very long time.  Go somewhere else.  We can’t help you.  And so the global pool of money looked around for some low-risk, high-return investment.  And among the many things they put their money into, there was one thing they fell in love with.”

Investment companies fell in love with securitizing mortgages, bundling them into enormous pools – in some cases, pools of as many as 16 million loans — and selling them in shares to investors.  To make the pool of mortgages even larger, they created vehicles like adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), subprime mortgages and no-income, no-asset loans that allowed people to buy homes or take out home equity loans that they simply could not afford.  Last 02192006_iraglassSeptember, this house of cards came crashing down, setting off the global credit crisis and making an ongoing recession the worst in a generation.

Click here  to listen to the full “The Giant Pool of Money” podcast from “This American Life” to learn exactly what happened and why.  I know of no better description of how the recession happened.

Deep Freeze of an Unregulated Economy

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

Iceland’s economic collapse, the result of a reckless government and a lack of financial regulation, is an object lesson to Americans who fear increased — but necessary – markets oversight.

Icelandic debt is 10 times the country’s GDP!  In the United States, our debt would have to be close to $100 trillion to put us in the same position.  Icelandic banks were deregulated during the mid-1990s, after which the economy was run like a giant hedge fund; following the economic collapse, citizens lost most of their savings and are saddled with debt and mortgages they can’t afford.  Inflation and unemployment are skyrocketing.  Is it any surprise that the neo-liberal government whose policies put Iceland into a financial vise fell following protests by infuriated citizens?deep-freeze1

So vast is their debt, Iceland’s insolvent banks may be forced to declare bankruptcy a second time.  When their own economic crises left the United States, Britain and the European Central Bank unable to bail out Iceland, the country turned to Russia and the International Monetary Fund in hopes of a financial rescue…maybe a miracle.

The interim government, a coalition of the Left-Green Party and Social Democrats, wants to rewrite Iceland’s constitution.  The goal is to “enshrine national ownership of the country’s natural resources” and to “open a new chapter in public participation in shaping the structure of the government”.  This marks a 180-degree change from the free-wheeling policies of the past where market regulation was non-existent.

Ever since American credit markets froze last fall, it’s become clear that a well-regulated economy equals a healthier one.