Bill Gates, Sr., a retired attorney in Washington state, supports a ballot initiative that would require the state’s highest earners — including himself and his son — to pay an income tax. Currently, the state does not collect personal income taxes.
The father of billionaire Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Jr., believes that the poor pay too much tax, and that the rich don’t pay enough. Washington’s school system, which is a catalyst for future economic growth in the high-tech state, suffers from too little funding because the wealthy aren’t paying their fair share, according to Gates. His 1098 initiative — an income tax on adjusted earnings that exceed $400,000 a year per couple or $200,000 for an individual — is drawing protest from Washington business leaders, as well as anti-tax groups.
Initiative 1098 would give tax credits to approximately 80 percent of Washington-based businesses and slash the state share of property taxes by 20 percent for businesses and homeowners. According to critics, the legislation would harm the economy by taxing the earnings of people who own the businesses — money that would be used to put people back to work. The opposition’s Defeat 1098 campaign believes that an income tax on 38,400 of the state’s highest earners would take away vital competitive advantages and drive away entrepreneurs. Even Governor Chris Gregoire’s Commerce Department has publicized Washington’s lack of an income tax in statements about the state’s business climate.
Gates considers Washington state’s tax system to be “dramatically regressive”, something that was proved in 2002 when he led a commission created by the Legislature to study the state tax system. The commission recommended replacing the sales tax or property tax with an income tax that would rebalance the load. Gates cited data gathered by the national Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy that show Washington’s poorest 20 percent pay 17 percent of their income in sales, property and other taxes. By contrast, the wealthiest one percent pays less than four percent.
The initiative would impose a state income tax on individuals earning more than $200,000 and couples earning upwards of $400,000. In other words, single people would pay a five percent tax on income over $200,000 and nine percent tax if they earn more than $500,000. Couples would pay five percent over $400,000 and nine percent if they earn a combined income that exceeds $1 million.
“It’s not a matter of picking on someone,” Gates said. “It’s a matter of correcting to some extent a bad historic situation and arguing — I think absolutely persuasively — that this is a proper source for a serious financial shortfall in our operations, namely the public education system.”
Gates’ proposal also has met opposition from Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO, and Jeff Bezos, President of Amazon.com, both of whom donated $100,000 to anti-tax groups.
Another voice of opposition is Stephen Moore, who wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “I wish I had a dollar for every time a wealthy liberal has declared he thinks he should pay more taxes. That list includes Warren Buffett, George Soros, Bill Gates Sr., Mark Zuckerberg and even Barack Obama, who now says that not only should rich people like him pay more taxes, they want to pay more.”
Gates is joined by Berkshire-Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett in calling for higher taxes on the wealthy. President Obama supports “the Buffett Rule”, a guiding principle to ensure that the rich pay as large a percentage of their income as the middle class. Some millionaires insist that Buffett doesn’t speak for them. “There is more of a difference between my financial position as a multi-millionaire and Buffett’s than there is between mine and a guy that makes minimum wage,” one CNN Money reader said. “Why am I grouped with him and why does he feel he can speak for me?”
Just 24 percent of millionaires said higher taxes on large incomes is the optimal solution, according to a survey from Spectrem Group, a research firm specializing in the finances of affluent Americans. The largest group of millionaires, 44 percent, believe that a flat-rate tax across all income brackets is the fairest system.
Apple’s
Google’s recently announced $12.5 billion acquisition of Chicago-based mobile phone maker Motorola Mobility could be different if Google CEO Larry Page keeps his promise to run the acquisition as “an independent business.” “If you believe what they say, they’re going to leave the company alone and let it do what it has been doing,” said Steven Kaplan, a professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. “If anything, maybe they would move resources here because the tech talent is less expensive and our taxes are lower (than California’s).”
Two of the nation’s leading billionaire philanthropists are joining forces to encourage others to donate as much as half of their wealth to charities. Microsoft founder
Changing your font can save significant money by requiring less ink to print documents. Because various fonts require different amounts of ink to print, changing to a simpler font can make printer cartridges last longer.
Does the introduction of Apple’s new iPad sound the death knell for laptop computers?
But all is not rosy for India. While the country has surged in the basic and mid-level areas of coding and development, it has struggled in the area of R&D and top-end innovation. India produces about 300,000 computer science graduates a year. Yet it produces only about 100 computer science PhDs, a small fraction of the 1,500 – 2,000 that get awarded in the United States or China every year according to a recent article from