Posts Tagged ‘property values’

Accounting Standards Designed to Increase Transparency

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

is_accountingprinciples_440x248New accounting standards calling for property to be marked to market,  and changes in lease accounting rules will strongly impact balance sheets, income statements and the general financial outlook of American companies. Unfortunately, many corporations are not ready to deal with the changes, according to a new report from CB Richard Ellis.  The mark-to-market requirement - known as FAS 157 - became effective for financial assets November 15, 2007, and for non-financial assets such as real estate on November 15, 2008.

CBRE’s white paper - entitled “FAS Talking - Unpacking Real Estate’s Impact on Financial Statements” - notes that the estimated balance sheet impact of the lease accounting revisions will be in excess of $1 trillion.  According to the report, the combined consequences of mark-to-market and lease accounting changes might negatively impact earnings, capital requirements, debt covenant ratios, credit ratings and other yardsticks of financial health.

Todd P. Anderson, CBRE senior managing director of global corporate services, who wrote the report with Michael M. Omiya, CFO of Boeing Realty Corporation, says that the changes are “a continuation of the effort to have greater financial transparency, in particular in the financial statements of publicly traded corporations.”  According to Anderson, “In the absence of comparable sales, you have to figure out how to establish a value for your property.”  Corporations should accomplish that before the end of the year when they are on deadline to complete tax and accounting responsibilities.  “The corporate real estate department, if it understands what’s going on in the mark-to-market arena, can come in early and start to take a look at its properties and basically create an argument for why it is valuing properties the way it is,” Anderson concludes.

Downtown Chicago Rental Apartments Thriving

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Downtown Chicago apartment buildings - especially Class A properties - are seeing a resurgence in occupancy and rental rates as residents apprehensive about the condominium market choose to rent rather than buy.  The average effective rent of downtown apartment buildings climbed to $2.17 PSF in the second quarter, a 2.4 percent increase over the first quarter, according to a report by Appraisal Research Counselors, a real estate consulting firm.  During the same time frame, average Class A occupancy rose to 93.4 percent, as compared with 90.9 percent in the first quarter and 91.6 percent a year ago.chicagoskyline1

The statistics would be even better if there weren’t so many new downtown apartment buildings.  More than 2,098 new units have been built downtown since 2008.  Add to that the shadow rental market - condominium owners who rent their units when they cannot sell.  Many potential buyers are renting for the time being because they are concerned about falling property values and the possibility that they will be unable to obtain a mortgage in a tight credit market.

These numbers show the inherent strength of Chicago’s CBD rental apartment market — proof that downtowns continue to thrive because of the number of highly educated knowledge workers who want to live in the city.  As a result, places like River North and the Loop remain highly sought after locations for businesses looking to recruit talent.

CMBS Maturities Face Eventual Day of Reckoning

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Moody’s reiterated its February analysis of CMBS loans,  noting that the majority of 2006 - 2008 ratings of conduit/fusion and large-loan deals are still stable.  The ratings agency warns that the assumptions hold up “as long as conditions in the commercial real estate market and the general economy do not weaken.”

large_foreclosed-propertySince February, “property prices have continued their march downward,” the Moody’s report notes.  Moody’s envisages a peak-to-trough price slide of more than 30 percent, with cap rates trending higher over the next several quarters.

“Despite the grim prognosis for property values, it is important to repeat the point made in the February report announcing our ratings sweep:  that property value is primarily a concern at loan maturity.”  Because most CMBS loan maturities will occur five to six years from now, “the maturity profile of the universe of CMBS loans is relatively benign.”

If the markets remain as weak in 2016 or 2017 as they are now, obviously there would be negative rating implications for CMBS.