Posts Tagged ‘heart disease’

Americans Spend More on Healthcare Than Comparable Nations

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

The United States spends far more on healthcare than other countries, although Americans visit the doctor and are hospitalized less often than most of the other 34 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD).  In its Health at a Glance 2011 report, the OECD shows that the United States spent about $7,960 per person on healthcare in 2009 – approximately 2.5 times the average of the countries studied.  It also determined that health spending in the U.S. has grown faster than in all other high-income OECD countries since 1970, even accounting for population growth.

“Why?” asks Julie Appleby in Kaiser Health News.  “Generally, prices for medical care are higher in the U.S. – and some services are performed more often.  Hospital prices are 60 percent higher than the average of 12 selected OECD countries, and the U.S. also generally pays more for each appendectomy, birth, joint replacement or cardiac procedure.  Americans have more imaging tests, such as CT scans and MRIs, than residents of other countries and are far more likely to have knee replacements, coronary angioplasty or surgery to remove their tonsils.  Even with all that, compared with most of the other developed countries, the U.S. has fewer practicing physicians per person, fewer hospital beds, and patients don’t stay as long in the hospital.  Administrative costs in the U.S. are also high, the report notes, accounting for about seven percent of total spending.  That is roughly comparable to what is spent in France and Germany, which have universal health coverage.  In Canada — another country with national healthcare – administrative costs are about four percent of health spending.”

“The U.S. is just this astonishing outlier compared to everyone else,” said Mark Pearson, the head of the OECD’s social policy division. A significant part of the difference relates to pricing.  American patients don’t spend more time in the hospital or visit more doctors than patients in other OECD countries; they pay more for everything.  Physician fees are more than twice the average cost, for example, while drugs and hospital care cost 60 percent more.  In terms of results, however, the U.S. does not come out on top.  Life expectancy in 2009 was 78.2 years, below the OECD average of 79.5.  That puts the nation closer to the Czech Republic and Chile, “not countries you would usually expect the U.S. to be compared to,” Pearson said.

The U.S. also has one of the poorest records in terms of premature mortality in general and mortality from heart disease in particular.  Americans have the highest obesity rate — with more than one-third of the population considered obese.  They also have one of the highest rates of hospital admission for illnesses that are optimally managed by primary-care physicians, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (including emphysema), and diabetes.

The news isn’t all bad.  The OECD report notes that the U.S. does an excellent job of cancer care, with very high survival rates and low mortality rates.  Stroke deaths are well below average in the United States.

Americans spend approximately 17.4 percent of its gross domestic product on healthcare; other OECD nations spend an average of 9.6 percent of their GDPs on healthcare.  According to OECD, the U.S. has an “underdeveloped” primary-care system that physician shortages only intensify.  There are 2.4 physicians for every 1,000 Americans, compared with an average of 3.1 in other countries.  Additionally, there are 3.1 hospital beds per 1,000 Americans, compared with 4.9 per 1,000 in other countries.

The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein thinks that Americans spend too much on healthcare. According to Klein, “There are a lot of complicated explanations for why American healthcare costs so much, but there are also some simple ones.  Chief among them is ‘we pay too much.’  And I don’t mean in general.  I mean specifically.  Mountains of research show that for every piece of care you might name — a drug, a doctor visit, a diagnostic — you’ll pay far more in the United States than in other countries.  That’s why seniors head to Canada to buy drugs made in the United States.  In Canada, the government negotiates one low price.  In America, insurers with much less bargaining power negotiate many higher prices.”

According to Ezekiel Emanuel, a bioethicist and fellow at the nonprofit bioethics research institute The Hastings Center, “Unfortunately, few people really understand how much we spend on healthcare, how much we need to spend to provide quality care, and the difference between the two.  Do we spend too much?  Let’s begin with the costs.  In 2010, the United States spent $2.6 trillion on healthcare, over $8,000 per American. This is such an enormous amount of money, it’s difficult to grasp.

“Consider this: France has the fifth largest economy in the world, with a gross domestic product of nearly $2.6 trillion.  The United States spends on healthcare alone what the 65 million people of France spend on everything: education, defense, the environment, scientific research, vacations, food, housing, cars, clothes and healthcare.  In other words, our health care spending is the fifth largest economy in the world.

“The fact is that when it comes to healthcare, the United States is on another planet.  The United States spends around 50 percent more per person than the next highest-spending countries, Switzerland and Norway.”

“Good” Cholesterol Can Protect Against Alzheimer’s Onset

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

Researchers at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons studied 1,130 people over the age of 65 and determined that so-called “good” cholesterol can reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer’s Disease.   In the study, the researchers recorded baseline measurements of the participants’ cholesterol levels and their neurological status.  Additionally, they determined if the seniors had a certain mutation in their APOE genes that might increase their risk of developing Alzheimer’s.

All volunteers were monitored for four years.  In that time, 89 of the study participants were diagnosed as having “probable” Alzheimer’s; another 12 had “possible” Alzheimer’s.  When comparing the participants with the lowest levels of high-density lipoprotein – the so-called “good” cholesterol, also known as HDL – the volunteers with the highest levels were 60 percent less likely to have a probable or even possible case of Alzheimer’s.

In completing their analysis, the researchers took into accounts age, gender, body-mass index, education and ethnic group.  Another point under consideration was the type of APOE gene,  as well as their general health or the presence of heart disease or type 2 diabetes.

The results are not unexpected, given that high levels of good cholesterol already have been associated with a lesser risk of carotid artery atheroschlerosis — which can lead to cognitive impairment – and strokes.

America Is Losing the War Against Obesity

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

America is putting on the pounds during this recession.  Americans are not getting thinner, and obesity rates have hit 30 percent of the population or higher in nine states last year, compared with just three states in 2007. Looking at the numbers from a different perspective, this means that 2.4 million additional Americans became obese in just two years, bringing the total to 72.5 million individuals, or 26.7 percent of the population.  Because the survey is based on a phone survey with 400,000 participants, the statistics probably underestimate true obesity rates.

According to Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which issued the survey, “Over the past several decades, obesity has increased faster than anyone could have imagined.”  If the numbers keep climbing, Frieden says that “more people will get sick and die from the complications of obesity, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer.”  The report says that obesity’s medical costs could be as high as $147 billion a year and notes that “past efforts and investments to prevent and control obesity have not been adequate.”  Too little exercise and too much fast food that is full of sugar and fat share much of the blame for the obesity epidemic.

The nine states with obesity rates of 30 percent or higher are Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and West Virginia.  Mississippi reported an obesity rate of whopping 34.4 percent.  Colorado and Washington, D.C., had the lowest obesity rates at less than 20 percent.  According to Dr. Heidi Blanck, the CDC’s chief of the obesity branch, Americans aged 50 and above had the highest obesity rates.

Are Short People Predisposed to Heart Disease?

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Finnish study links height to likelihood of heart disease.Petite people may be getting the short end of the health stick.  A new study reveals that men under 5′ 5″ and women under 5′ tall may be 50 percent more likely than taller people to suffer heart attacks, according to a report in the European Heart Journal.

“Older people are shorter,” according to the study’s lead author, Tuula Paajanen, M.D., a researcher at Finland’s University of Tampere.  “Also, you have to remember that height is at least a combination of genetics, socioeconomic status, and nutritional status.  So when using heights, we are also thinking about some confounding factors.”  Paajanen and her research team analyzed data from 52 quality studies of more than three million individuals.  Literally hundreds of studies – some dating back to the early 1950s – have investigated the possible link between height and heart disease.  The current study is the first systematic examination and analysis of the earlier studies on the subject.

Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the cardiovascular sciences division at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, cautioned that the study’s “major limitation is a failure to take into account confounding factors.  It’s much easier to measure somebody’s height than it is to measure lots of other fundamental factors that could affect height.”  He noted that nutrition is a vital environmental factor that impacts height and heart health alike.  Jaako Tuomilehto, M.D., a professor in the public health department at the University of Helsinki, says that children who received inadequate nourishment before and after birth, tend to grow more slowly.

While acknowledging the study’s limitations, Paajanen says “People have no control over their height or genetics, but they can control their weight and lifestyle habits such as smoking, drinking and exercise.  All of these together affect heart disease risk.  The more risk factors you have, the more effort you should concentrate to reduce the risk factors you can.”

Don’t Worry, Be Happy.

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

A study has found that happier people are healthier, have fewer heart attacks and strokes.Happy people tend to have fewer heart attacks and strokes, evidence that a positive attitude is heart-healthy, according to a study conducted by Columbia University Medical Center. Researchers tracked 1,739 healthy Canadian adults living in Nova Scotia to determine if positive personality traits such as happiness, contentment and enthusiasm impact risk for heart disease.

Prior to the study, researchers determined the participants’ degree of negative emotions such as depression, hostility and anxiety.  They also measured positive emotions, including joy, happiness and excitement.  Although naturally happy people do experience depression and other negative emotions at times, lead researcher Karina W. Davidson, PhD, recognizes that this is usually caused by a certain situation and is transient.  “We know from previous studies that negative emotion is predictive of heart disease,” Davidson said.  “We wanted to find out if positive affect is protective.”

Taking known risk factors into account, the researchers found that the happiest people were 22 percent less likely to develop heart disease over the study’s 10 years when compared with individuals who fell in the middle of the negative-positive emotion scale.  The most negative people had the highest risk of heart disease.  According to Davidson, “It is just speculation at this point, but there are several possible explanations for how happiness may protect the heart.”

Happy people tend to have a healthier lifestyle, eat better, sleep well, smoke less and exercise more.  Another finding is that happiness may produce positive chemical changes in the body, such as a reduction in stress hormones.  Genetic influences could mean that people who are predisposed to happiness also tend to have fewer heart attacks.

Wellness Is a Proactive Approach to Healthcare

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Now is the time for healthcare providers to take a proactive approach to the well-being of their respective communities and target markets.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), signed into law by President Obama on February 17, contains $1 billion for the new Prevention and Wellness Fund.  This Fund will make available resources for funding immunization programs; infection prevention programs; and the prevention of mpj040515400001chronic diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease.  Based on statistics provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 70 million people in the United States (approximately 25 percent of our total population) live with cardiovascular disease.  Wellness programs have a direct impact on the prevention of these diseases and will be an important components of any preventative program.

Healthcare providers have historically been hesitant to invest in wellness and fitness centers due to the capital resource requirement and uncertain return on investment.  With careful planning and strategic development, these facilities can bring a substantial new revenue stream into the organization.  Skeptics may point to the Medical Fitness Association, which reports that in 2008 there were approximately 950 medically based wellness and fitness centers in the United States, with one-third reporting operating losses.

While such risks do exist, investing in wellness facilities and programs that directly address the prevention of chronic disease have the potential for more than satisfactory financial results.  If managed with a clear direction, thought and competence, these facilities can provide a financial return far more attractive than the equities market has offered in the recent past.  The resources allocated to fight chronic disease will come back tenfold in cost reductions over the long term.

Now is the time to invest in the well-being of our future.  We should not wait for another opportunity like the one Congress and President Obama have provided.  We need to take advantage of this now.