Posts Tagged ‘President Obama’

Wellness Is a Proactive Approach to Healthcare

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Now is the time for healthcare providers to take a proactive approach to the well-being of their respective communities and target markets.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), signed into law by President Obama on February 17, contains $1 billion for the new Prevention and Wellness Fund.  This Fund will make available resources for funding immunization programs; infection prevention programs; and the prevention of mpj040515400001chronic diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease.  Based on statistics provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 70 million people in the United States (approximately 25 percent of our total population) live with cardiovascular disease.  Wellness programs have a direct impact on the prevention of these diseases and will be an important components of any preventative program.

Healthcare providers have historically been hesitant to invest in wellness and fitness centers due to the capital resource requirement and uncertain return on investment.  With careful planning and strategic development, these facilities can bring a substantial new revenue stream into the organization.  Skeptics may point to the Medical Fitness Association, which reports that in 2008 there were approximately 950 medically based wellness and fitness centers in the United States, with one-third reporting operating losses.

While such risks do exist, investing in wellness facilities and programs that directly address the prevention of chronic disease have the potential for more than satisfactory financial results.  If managed with a clear direction, thought and competence, these facilities can provide a financial return far more attractive than the equities market has offered in the recent past.  The resources allocated to fight chronic disease will come back tenfold in cost reductions over the long term.

Now is the time to invest in the well-being of our future.  We should not wait for another opportunity like the one Congress and President Obama have provided.  We need to take advantage of this now.

Healthcare Reform Will Not Mandate Rationing

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer’s negative assessment of President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform package is based on his belief that the plan is economically feasible only if that care is rationed.

180px-rationingboardnolavachoncTo quote Krauthammer:  “Rationing is not quite as alien to America as we think.  We already ration kidneys and hearts for transplant according to survivability criteria, as well as by queuing.  A nationalized health insurance system would ration everything from MRIs to intensive care by myriad similar criteria.”

Krauthammer’s personal preference is “for a highly competitive, privatized health insurance system with a government-subsidized transition to portability, breaking the absurd and ruinous link between health insurance and employment.  But if you believe healthcare is a public good to be guaranteed by the state, then a single-payer system is the next best alternative.  Unfortunately, it is fiscally unsustainable without rationing.”

Krauthammer is wrong!  In the United States, healthcare is rationed but it is according to your income and insurance status.  And for the 47 million Americans who don’t have insurance, we ARE already rationing everything, “from MRIs to intensive care (to use Krauthammer’s examples)”.  We have to accept that no matter what the system is that we adopt, that rationing will occur.  The issue is rationing that is unethical and doesn’t meet the mission of healthcare.  The way to mitigate rationing in a nationalized system may be to do what the British Medical Association has suggested, which is to define a set of core services – cardiac care, for example – -which may fall under the rubric of life threatening.  These would never be rationed regardless of who you are.  More elective procedures or non life-threatening procedures, on the other hand, would be rationed.  We can’t expect our health system to do it all and this seems a modest proposal.

Democrats May Use “Nuclear Option” to Pass Healthcare Reform

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

The Obama administration is playing hardball to force Congress to pass healthcare reform legislation before the end of the year – preferably without the customary Republican-led filibuster delaying the final vote. obamahealthcare President Obama’s aggressive approach to protect healthcare legislation from Republican filibusters demonstrates the magnitude this ambitious reform package and has come to be called in some circles the nuclear option.

The agreement between the White House and Congressional Democrats lets healthcare legislation that meets budget targets win approval by a simple Senate majority — a process called reconciliation.  Not surprisingly, Republican leaders are up in arms about the no-filibuster deal, claiming that healthcare is too important to be exempt from the Senate’s usual rules.

Republicans have threatened to use their own procedural weapons to bog down the Senate if the Democrats try to restrict filibusters.  Options include forcing multiple votes on routine bills, inaction on administration nominations, or requiring lengthy legislation to be read in full.  Even some Democrats – notably Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Max Baucus of Montana – are uncomfortable with reconciliation.  Other Democrats point out that Senate Republicans successfully used reconciliation to enact President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

The president is relying on his significant political capital to push his agenda through, relying on unwavering support from his sizable Senate Democratic majority.  This is likely to total 60 Senators once the Minnesota courts finally certify Al Franken’s victory, and as a result of Arlen Specter’s surprise exit from the Republican Party. That could give President Obama the filibuster-proof majority he wants.