Wednesday, December 8th, 2010
The Senate recently passed landmark legislation to make food safer and prevent deadly outbreaks of E. coli and salmonella. The law – if the House of Representatives also gives its blessing – gives the federal government broad powers to step up inspections of food processing facilities and compel firms to recall bad food. The $1.4 billion legislation – which will impose stricter standards on imported foods – sailed through the Senate on a bipartisan 73 – 25 vote. Outbreaks of food-related diseases have strained the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) resources in its efforts to trace the contaminated products and take them off the market.
The legislation emphasizes prevention so the FDA can halt outbreaks before they start. Farmers and food processors will be required to tell the FDA how they are working to keep food safe throughout every stage of production. President Barack Obama hailed the bill’s passage, noting that “We are one step closer to having critically important new tools to protect our nation’s food supply and keep consumers safe.” Despite broad support, the bill had stalled in the Senate because some feared it would harm small-scale farmers. Senator Jon Tester (R-MT) added an amendment that will exempt some of those operations from expensive food safety plans required by bigger producers.
Although the House of Representatives approved the legislation in July of 2009, that bill does not include the same exemption. With little time left in the current lame-duck session of Congress, the question is whether the Senate and House can reconcile the two versions of the bill. Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), a sponsor of the legislation, said there is support in the House to pass the Senate version of the bill. If Senator Harkin is correct, the bill could be on its way to the White House for President Obama’s signature before the 111th Congress goes into recess.
Tags: E. coli, Food and Drug Administration, food safety, House of Representatives, Lame-duck Congress, Pew Health Group, President Barack Obama, public health, reconciliation, salmonella, Senate, Senator Jon Tester, Senator Tom Harkin
Posted in Healthcare, Hospital Systems | No Comments »
Thursday, April 8th, 2010
A little-known star in achieving healthcare reform is Alan Frumin, the Senate’s Parliamentarian, who wields as much power over the debate as President Barack Obama. A scholar of Senate procedure, Frumin is one of the few people who fully comprehend the arcane rules that govern a piece of legislation’s progress on the Senate floor. Though Frumin is technically an advisor to the Democratic majority – who gave him the job — Senators can rule on procedures as he recommends or ignore him and act as they please.
Frumin is in the spotlight because of the possible use of reconciliation, the parliamentary shortcut that lets the Senate pass legislation with a 51-vote majority instead of the usual 60. According to the Byrd rule of 1985 – named for its author, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) – reconciliation is intended to be used only with budget-related items. In keeping with that, Frumin has said that reconciliation must be related to existing law. Frumin’s ruling is that the House of Representatives must pass the Senate healthcare plan, send it to President Obama for his signature, and then vote to pass the “fixes” proposed by the president.
Once the vote reached the Senate, Frumin found two errors in the legislation, which meant that the bill had to go back to the House after Senators voted to approve by a 56-43 margin. The House voted its final approval in a 220 – 207 vote and was sent back to President Obama’s desk for his final signature.
The parliamentarian’s advice is not set in stone. Vice President Joseph Biden, in his role as Senate president, can overturn the parliamentarian’s ruling. “This is probably the most difficult situation for any Senate parliamentarian in my memory,” said Robert Dove, who previously held the position. “I was never under the pressure that Alan Frumin is under right now.”
Tags: Alan Frumin, Congress, Democrats, healthcare reform debate, President Barack Obama, reconciliation, Republicans, Robert Dove, Senate Parliamentarian, Senator Robert Byrd, Vice President Joseph Biden
Posted in Healthcare | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 12th, 2009
The Obama administration is playing hardball to force Congress to pass healthcare reform legislation before the end of the year – preferably without the customary Republican-led filibuster delaying the final vote.
President Obama’s aggressive approach to protect healthcare legislation from Republican filibusters demonstrates the magnitude this ambitious reform package and has come to be called in some circles the nuclear option.
The agreement between the White House and Congressional Democrats lets healthcare legislation that meets budget targets win approval by a simple Senate majority — a process called reconciliation. Not surprisingly, Republican leaders are up in arms about the no-filibuster deal, claiming that healthcare is too important to be exempt from the Senate’s usual rules.
Republicans have threatened to use their own procedural weapons to bog down the Senate if the Democrats try to restrict filibusters. Options include forcing multiple votes on routine bills, inaction on administration nominations, or requiring lengthy legislation to be read in full. Even some Democrats – notably Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Max Baucus of Montana – are uncomfortable with reconciliation. Other Democrats point out that Senate Republicans successfully used reconciliation to enact President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.
The president is relying on his significant political capital to push his agenda through, relying on unwavering support from his sizable Senate Democratic majority. This is likely to total 60 Senators once the Minnesota courts finally certify Al Franken’s victory, and as a result of Arlen Specter’s surprise exit from the Republican Party. That could give President Obama the filibuster-proof majority he wants.
Tags: Al Franken, Arlen Specter, Congress, Congressional Democrats, Democrat, George W Bush, Healthcare, Kent Conrad, legislation, Max Baucus, Minnesota, Montana, no-filibuster deal, North Dakota, Obama, Obama administration, political capital, President Obama, reconciliation, Republican, Republican-led filibuster, White House
Posted in Economics, Healthcare, Hospital Systems | No Comments »