Posts Tagged ‘recession’

Migration Leads Thousands to Georgia, Arizona, Despite Recession

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Arizona, Georgia and Texas lead the nation in new household formations.  Arizona, Georgia and Texas are the growth centers in terms of new residents in the last few years, according to an Associated Press analysis of Internal Revenue Service migration data. The IRS compared the states where taxpayers filed their returns from 2007 to 2008 to arrive at their conclusions.

Texas led the nation, with 62,827 new households; the largest number of families moved there from California and overseas.  Georgia ranked second, with 37,559 new households, many of whom moved there primarily from Florida and New York.  Arizona reported a net gain of 20,300 new households, with the majority relocating there from California and Michigan.

The IRS statistics indicate that Americans are not moving much at present, with the annual migration rate at 11.9 percent - the lowest number in decades.  United States Census Bureau estimates released at the end of 2009 confirm the IRS numbers.  According to the AP analysis, counties with better-educated taxpayers typically see the highest county-to-county migration gains.

“People who move tend to be younger and have lower incomes,” according to William Frey, a demographer with the Brookings Institution.  “Normally, if there is a big influx of young people, that could pull down the income of an area; and if there is a big outflux of young people, that can raise income in an area.”

Two New Studies: Commercial Real Estate Recovery Seen in 2011

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Two major new reports see recovery in 2011.  Commercial real estate will begin its long-awaited recovery in late 2011 or 2012, according to the fourth-quarter Korpacz Real Estate Investor Survey, which questioned more than 100 real estate investors, including REITs, pension funds, private equity firms and insurance and mortgage companies.  Confirmation is provided by a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey, which notes that Washington policymakers are increasingly tweaking the strings that impact pricing.

According to the Korpacz survey, “Rental rates will continue to decline until strong, consistent job growth resumes.  With $1.4 trillion of commercial real estate debt maturing by the end of 2012, some property owners will not be able to survive the downturn.  Problems related to refinancing that debt could further delay a recovery in the sector.”

Government and regulatory policy will have greater impact on pricing than occupancy levels or rents, according to Real Capital Analytics, Inc.  “Policymakers control what happens to commercial mortgages in default,” Robert White, the president of Real Capital Analytics, wrote in a report.  They “have encouraged loan modifications and extensions even in cases where loans are above a property’s current value.  Tax policy, meanwhile, has made it easier for special servicers to negotiate with borrowers, a move meant to prevent a wave of maturity defaults and property fire sales.  Keep rates low and easing restrictions on foreign capital will also influence industry prospects.”  Real Capital Analytics notes that commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) hold 42 percent of distressed loans; American banks 31 percent; and foreign banks 13 percent.

Hedge Fund Honcho’s Bet Pays Off Big

Monday, February 1st, 2010

David Tepper’s shopping trip for cheap Bank of America and Citigroup stocks a $7 billion windfall.  David Tepper’s shrewd bet that the nation would avoid a second Great Depression inspired him to buy bank shares at rock-bottom rates, a move that has earned his Appaloosa Management hedge fund an estimated $7 billion worth of profit during 2009.  Last winter, Tepper invested heavily in Bank of America stocks selling for $3 a share, as well as Citigroup, Inc. preferred stock, then priced at a bargain-basement $1 per share.

Tepper, a philanthropist who funded the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, made a gamble that is paying off in a big way - surprising skeptics who insisted that he was making a costly error.  “I felt like I was alone,” Tepper said.  There were days when “no one was even bidding.”  An improving market has seen Appaloosa Management earn a 120 percent return.  As a result of those gains, Tepper now manages approximately $12 billion, making his company one of the world’s largest hedge funds.

In general, hedge funds had a bad year in 2008, when they experienced a 19 percent decline.  Approximately 1,500 funds - 16 percent of the total - went out of business in 2008.  The funds had a far better year in 2009.  According to Hedge Fund Research, Inc., they are seeing a 19 percent return, the best annual gains in 10 years.

Alan Shealy, a long-time Tepper client, says “Investing with David is like flying, with hours of boredom followed by bouts of sheer terror.  He’s the quintessential opportunist, investing in any asset class, but you have to have a cast-iron stomach.”

It’s a Renter’s Market

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Apartment vacancies in the United States hit a 30-year high during the fourth quarter of 2009 as many would-be renters moved in with family or roommates to save money.  According to Reis, Inc., a New York research firm that tracks vacancies and rents in 79 markets across the country, the apartment vacancy rate was eight percent at year’s end.Apartment vacancies at a 30-year high as failed condominiums glut the market.

Rents declined by three percent in 2009, even as landlords upped the ante to attract creditworthy renters.  In New York City, effective rents - which include concessions such as one month free rent - fell 5.6 percent last year, the worst performance since Reis first tracked data in 1990.  Asking rents fell 2.3 percent from 2008 to an average of $1,026. Effective rents, what tenants actually paid, decreased three percent to $964.

“We’ll shampoo their carpets.  We’ll paint accent walls.  We’ll add Starbucks cards,” said Richard Campo, chief executive of Camden Property Trust, a Houston-based REIT that owns 63,000 apartments.  Complicating the situation is competition from 120,000 new rental units that came on the market last year.  These include some failed condominium projects that were converted to rentals.  A hefty percentage of these developments had secured loans before the credit markets froze.  With new development at a virtual standstill, apartment completions are expected to decline 50 percent in 2011.  For apartment owners, the limited new supply means they can increase rents as soon as job growth returns.

“If you are renting a place, now might be a good time to renegotiate that lease,” advises Victor Calanog, Reis’ director of research, who predicts that the apartment sector could recover in the second half of 2010 if jobs start returning or people think the economy is improving.

Investors Lining Up for U.S. Real Estate

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Investors placing their bets on the United States once again.  Foreign banks, American private equity firms and a leading Chinese sovereign wealth fund have been investing in commercial real estate in the United States in the hope that interest rates stay low.

This increasing interest from investors could be a sign that the market is experiencing some stabilization.  According to Bob Steers, co-chairman of Cohen & Steers, a real estate investment firm, “We believe the real story is that capital is ready to buy, even though it may not be so visible today.”  As one example, the state-owned China Investment Corporation has enlisted several investment firms to identify commercial real estate opportunities in the United States.

Another sign of incipient recovery is the fact that Colony Capital won a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) auction for $1 billion worth of commercial property loans previously held by banks that had failed.  The transaction valued the loans at 44 cents on the dollar and is structured so the FDIC put up $136 million owns 60 percent of the equity.  Los Angeles-based Colony put up $90 million for a 40 percent share.  Colony’s founder, Tom Barrack, said the investment is “an implicit bet that rates stay low.”

In another example, JPMorgan Chase raised $625 million for Inland Western, which put $500 million into CMBS.  The deal was significant because it closed without assistance from the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF).

Two New Studies: Commercial Real Estate Recovery Seen in 2011

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Two major new reports see recovery in 2011.  Commercial real estate will begin its long-awaited recovery in late 2011 or 2012, according to the fourth-quarter Korpacz Real Estate Investor Survey, which questioned more than 100 real estate investors, including REITs, pension funds, private equity firms and insurance and mortgage companies.  Confirmation is provided by a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey, which notes that Washington policymakers are increasingly tweaking the strings that impact pricing.

According to the Korpacz survey, “Rental rates will continue to decline until strong, consistent job growth resumes.  With $1.4 trillion of commercial real estate debt maturing by the end of 2012, some property owners will not be able to survive the downturn.  Problems related to refinancing that debt could further delay a recovery in the sector.”

Government and regulatory policy will have greater impact on pricing than occupancy levels or rents, according to Real Capital Analytics, Inc.  “Policymakers control what happens to commercial mortgages in default,” Robert White, the president of Real Capital Analytics, wrote in a report.  They “have encouraged loan modifications and extensions even in cases where loans are above a property’s current value.  Tax policy, meanwhile, has made it easier for special servicers to negotiate with borrowers, a move meant to prevent a wave of maturity defaults and property fire sales.  Keep rates low and easing restrictions on foreign capital will also influence industry prospects.”  Real Capital Analytics notes that commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) hold 42 percent of distressed loans; American banks 31 percent; and foreign banks 13 percent.

Repealed Glass-Steagall Act Played a Role in Financial Meltdown

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Glass-Steagall repeal helped bring on the great recession.  When President Bill Clinton signed legislation to repeal the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, he handed Wall Street  a victory that likely contributed to the recent financial meltdown. Glass-Steagall’s repeal eliminated barriers between normal banking activities - deposits and lending - and riskier areas such as derivatives trading.

“The capital-market rules are going to change,” says Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Company in New York.  “It’s going to be much more difficult to trade in the illiquid parts of the market” beyond corporate and government bonds, as well as to finance investments.

President Barack Obama is working with his advisors and Congress to fill the regulatory void that Glass-Steagall’s repeal left.  Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, now a financial advisor in the Obama administration, prefers a “two-tier” financial system that limits risk taking.  Current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has increased surveillance of the systemically important firms and believes that these companies require “especially close oversight.”

To quote then-candidate Obama in a spring of 2008 speech, “A regulatory structure set up for banks in the 1930s needed to change.  But by the time the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed in 1999, the $300 million lobbying effort that drove deregulation was more about facilitating mergers than creating an efficient regulatory framework.”

The result?  Commercial banks seeking to compete with investment banks took on significant trading risks and created off-balance-sheet financing methods to reduce the capital they required to avoid loan losses.  At the same time, investment banks started lending more aggressively to companies and increased their own borrowing to purchase securities or real estate.

All that has occurred clearly demonstrates the need for effective new regulation.

Student Housing Appears to Be Recession Proof

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Fornelli Hall - Downtown Chicago Luxury Student Housing

Because the United States is producing an increasing number of high school graduates who go on to attend college, student housing apparently is recession-proof  real estate.  This is the finding of a recently released report from the National Multi Housing Council (NMHC) that studied the recession’s impact on college enrollment and on-campus dormitory vacancy rates.

According to Jim Arbury, NMHC’s senior vice president, the study - entitled “Special Student Housing Report:  Has the Recession Had an Impact?” - examined freshman application data for 63 universities and compares 2009 levels to 2008, as well as to statistics from 2003.

“This report offers valuable benchmarks on the toll the economy is taking on universities, and, by extension, current demand for student housing,” Arbury said.  “And it provides vital enrollment data a full six weeks or more before the universities release their numbers.  Our research indicates that applications and enrollments are up at most universities.  The only places we generally find declining or flat enrollments are in states where the higher education budget has been dramatically reduced or where the university itself is geographically constrained from any further growth.”

Young Entrepreneur Responds to Recession

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Young Entrepreneur Responds to RecessionJason Sadler, a 26-year-old former marketing professional from Florida has resolved his unemployment woes  by founding his own company - I Wear Your Shirt.  The entrepreneurial concept is simple.  Sadler wears a T-shirt provided by any company for a day and uses social media tools to promote the firm.  And it’s earning Sadler nearly $85,000 this year.

The cost for Sadler’s service is the face value of the day.  On January 1, he charges just $1; that rises to $365 by December 31.  All 2009 dates are taken, and Sadler’s 2010 calendar is rapidly filling up with companies who want to take advantage of his promotional expertise.

If Sadler sells out every day - as he did in 2009 - iwearyourshirt earns $66,795 a year.  He also sells monthly sponsorships for $1,500, which adds an additional $18,000.  “I walk around, take photos, wear the shirt all day…I blog about those photos.  I put ‘em up on Twitter, I change my Facebook profile…and then I do a Youtube video,” Sadler said.

Sadler’s success is such that he plans to grow his business.  He wants to hire someone on the West Coast to expand iwearyourshirt.com’s exposure.  Once he is able to offer coverage on both coasts, Sadler is doubling his rates.

Recession Saves 1929 Daily News Building from Wrecking Ball

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

2riversideplazaThe recession has thwarted real estate billionaire Sam Zell’s plans to raze the art deco, 80-year-old, 26-story 2 North Riverside Plaza building that housed the Chicago Daily News until 1960 and replace it with an office tower.  Instead, Zell’s Equity Group Investments is beginning a multi-million dollar renovation of the building, which the advocacy group Preservation Chicago placed on its “Chicago Seven” list of endangered buildings in 2008.

The renovation includes basic fixes that appeal to prospective tenants, such as replacing old windows with energy-efficient ones and converting to electric heat from steam.  Aesthetic improvements include cleaning the sphinx-shaped building’s limestone exterior and renovating the art deco lobbies with their metal decorations inspired by flowers.

Writing in the Chicago Tribune, Pulitzer Prize-winning architecture critic Blair Kamin expresses some disappointment in the building’s renovation plans, although he is pleased that the building is being saved for the time being.  According to Kamin, “Another reason for disappointment is that the renovation will introduce generic design elements, like the curving, vaguely art deco light fixtures that will hang in the historic lobbies.  And, as currently designed, the project will obscure dazzling, first-floor elevator-door decoration behind new walls meant to control pedestrian flow.  Why bring back precious art deco decoration on one floor if you are going to hide it on another?  Despite such faults, architecture buffs and historic preservationists should be pleased that they have won at least a temporary victory by staving off either a demolition or defacement of 2 North Riverside.”