Posts Tagged ‘Republicans’

House GOP Taking a Second Look at Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Law

Thursday, November 18th, 2010

Congressional Republicans may water down the financial reform law.  The newly empowered Republicans in the House of Representatives will attempt to rein in regulators who are in the process of implementing the comprehensive reform of financial rules and advocate for a smaller government role in the mortgage market.  By taking control of the House in the recent mid-term elections, the GOP will have more influence over the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and greater sway over any technical fixes that Congress makes to rules that govern derivatives trading.

“We don’t want them to regulate capriciously, arbitrarily, without engaging in a cost-benefit analysis,” said Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), a member of the House Financial Services Committee.  President Barack Obama brought attention to the Republicans’ intent in a recent radio and Internet address, noting that House and Senate members “are now beating the drum to repeal all of these reforms and consumer protections.  I think it would be a terrible mistake,” he said.

With Democrats still in control of the Senate and in the White House, it’s highly unlikely that the Republicans will be able to carry out a fundamental revision or even repeal of the Dodd-Frank law.  There’s also the possibility of a presidential veto if repeal legislation makes it through both houses on Congress.  Because the Republicans now have a majority in the House, the diminished number of Senate Democrats will have to reach across party lines on financial issues for the simple reason that any changes will require support from both parties.  Bipartisan compromise will be used to arrive at consensus in the next Congress, said Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD), who is replacing the retiring Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT), who headed the Senate Banking Committee.  According to Johnson, “We sometimes differ on how we achieve our goals, but we have to agree more often than not.”

Save the Planet; Prevent Commercial Mortgage Meltdown

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

The “CRE Solution” could create green jobs while averting commercial building foreclosures.  A total of $1.4 trillion worth of commercial real estate loans are coming due between now and 2014, with the majority on small- and medium-sized buildings that are either under water or very nearly there.  Writing for the Huffington Post, Daphne Wysham says that “crisis breeds opportunity. It turns out that buildings are responsible for about half of America’s emissions of greenhouse gases.”  Wysham, a fellow and board member of the Institute for Policy Studies, is founder and co-director of the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network, as well as founder and co-host of Earthbeat Radio, which airs on 54 stations in the United States and Canada.

According to Wysham, “Here’s the crazy truth:  With a national effort to boost energy efficiency, we could actually meet the building sector’s greenhouse gas emissions target set by the Obama administration for the next few years, put 1,300,000 million workers – 600,000 of them construction workers, 20 percent of whom are unemployed – back to work and dodge the next wave of mortgage meltdowns.  We could make a painless downpayment on our emissions reductions goals, while giving some of our beleaguered businesses a tax break and saving money we’re now squandering on wasted energy.”

Architects and researchers from Architecture 2020 have devised what they call the “CRE Solution”, which would allow small business and business owners in danger of default a multi-year tax break if they retrofit to improve energy efficiency.  “The more energy efficient the building becomes, the greater the tax break,” Wysham said.  “Commercial building owners could trade or sell these tax deductions to investors, who would be invested in putting our highly skilled construction workers back on the job, retrofitting these properties.  For the $6 billion in tax breaks the federal government would provide for this purpose, Uncle Sam would receive $10 billion back in net federal tax revenue, while state and local governments netted $5.25 billion.”

Arizona Ponders Sale/Leaseback of Some State Buildings to Cover $3.4 Billion Deficit

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Arizona looking to do sale/leasebacks on some state buildings to raise fast cash.  The cash-strapped State of Arizona may sell the identical House and Senate buildings where legislative business has been conducted for 50 years. A total of 32 properties within the Capitol complex, valued in excess of $1 billion, may be sold and leased for several years prior to assuming ownership again.  Investors would benefit from long-term lease payments from a stable tenant.  According to projections, the sale/leaseback arrangement would infuse as much as $735 million into the state’s coffers.  The plan, which has bipartisan support, isn’t popular with Arizona’s taxpayers, who once owned the buildings free and clear.

Although Governor Jan Brewer vetoed a sale/leaseback proposal during the summer, the provision is expected to return as a solution to the state’s $3.4 billion deficit.  The list of properties targeted for possible sale and leaseback encompasses buildings that provide necessary government services.  Included are the House and Senate buildings, the Phoenix and Tucson headquarters of the Arizona Department of Public Safety, the State Hospital, state fairgrounds and several prisons.  The properties were selected based on their appeal to potential investors.

“We’ve mortgaged the legislative halls,” said Representative Steve Yarbrough.  “That just tells you how extraordinary the times are.  To me, it’s something we’re going to have to do no matter how much we find it undesirable.”

The 1900 State Capitol building, now a museum, is not up for sale.

How Will President Obama Impact Commercial Real Estate? Part 1

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

With change expected to begin in Washington, D.C., on January 20, 2009, the commercial real estate industry is bracing itself for the incoming Obama administration and the 111th Congress.  CoStar Advisor recently polled commercial real estate professionals on the top issues of the first 100 days.  The resulting list includes such policy issues as saying “no” to capital-gains increases and other investment taxes; moving forcefully to stabilize the Treasury and capital markets; suspending market rules regulating perceived asset value; making the biggest investment in the public infrastructure since the 1950s; and reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The overall attitude within the industry, according to a poll by National Real Estate Investor, is negative because of Obama’s plan to hike taxes on dividend income, capital gains and high-earning individuals.  The poll notes that 54 percent of responders are registered Republicans.

So, should our industry be wary of the new team?

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Commercial-real-estate-stocks-rally/story.aspx?guid=%7BF3669FE9-C7E9-4D5C-9A85-AE7FECF0E5DF%7D