Posts Tagged ‘Sovereign wealth funds’

Low Interest Rates Are Hurting Banks, Pension Funds

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

Low Interest Rates Are Hurting Banks, Pension FundsThe current ultra-low interest rates are hurting profit margins at banks that depend on the gap between what they charge borrowers and pay depositors to make money.   Pension funds also are hurting, because they are under growing pressure to meet their retirees’ obligations.  Meanwhile, some types of insurance are more costly as firms attempt to regain earnings that will continue shrinking until interest rates rise.  Two years of low interest rates, coupled with the Fed’s plan to purchase as much as $900 billion of U.S. Treasury notes through the middle of 2011, have been a boon to borrowers such as companies, consumers, cities and states.

“It is clear that there are costs,” said Michael Cloherty, chief of U.S. interest-rate strategy at RBC Capital Markets.  “The question is whether the good done by low interest rates is enough to justify forcing people and institutions to incur these costs.”  Although many American banks have recovered from the subprime-mortgage meltdown and the Great Recession, others are finding that low interest rates are hurting their profitability.

Banks that say they have more than $1 billion in assets have seen their net interest margin (a performance metric that examines how successful a firm’s investment decisions are compared to its debt situations)  fall to 3.74 percent as of September 30, compared with 3.85 percent in March, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC).  “We have probably seen the high-water mark for margins in the 3rd quarter,” said Mark Fitzgibbon, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners LP.  “In the next several quarters, we will see it move lower.”  Goldman Sachs Group’s Scott McDermott is advising clients – pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds – that low interest rates are “going to be here for a while…  Don’t assume that this environment will disappear next month or next year and things will go back to normal.”

Robert Knakal on the Bulls vs. the Bears – Who Do You Trust?

Monday, October 18th, 2010

Robert Knakal discusses whether the bulls or bears are right about the economy. Who’s right about the state of the economy and commercial real estate – the bulls or the bears?  Robert Knakal, chairman of New York-based Massey Knakal Realty Services, weighs both sides to help us cut through the mixed messages.

In a recent interview for the Alter NOW Podcasts, Knakal noted that the bulls like to cite the best back-to-back GDP growth since 2003 – 5.9 percent in the 4th quarter of 2009 and 3.2 percent in the 1st quarter of 2010.  Bears, on the other hand, believe that weak consumer spending will cause the GDP to grow at an anemic two to three percent for the rest of the year.  Knakal views this is an interesting dynamic because of the growing number of economists who back the bears’ position – numbers that are well below the trend coming out of a recessionary period.

Knakal, a graduate of the Wharton School of Business, also writes StreetWise, a nationally syndicated real estate industry blog, is concerned that many loans made by community and regional banks are five-year loans, which will mature in 2011 and 2012.  These loans raise the loudest alarms, because many are still performing thanks to very advantageous interest rates – possibly in the form of interest-only loans or with interest reserves that are carrying the property.  When these loans – which now could have an interest rate as low as two percent – mature, it will be renewed at a 5 ½ or six percent interest rate that will require a de-leveraging process.  Some $10 billion banks are carrying half of all their commercial real estate exposure in Small Business Administration (SBA) loans.

Despite the bears’ lack of confidence in the commercial real estate markets, capital is available to credit-worthy users chasing high-credit projects.  The amount of available private equity is currently estimated at approximately $173 billion.  Public REITs raised more in common stock offerings in 2009 than they did in the previous nine years.  Non-public REITs are expected to raise $10 billion this year.  Sovereign wealth funds are said to have access to an astonishing $3.5 trillion.  What Knakal cautions us to recognize is that these often represent the same pools of equity and to draw the distinction between capital that has been promised and that which is actually available.

 
icon for podpress  Robert Knakal on the Bulls vs. the Bears - Who Do You Trust? : Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Investors Lining Up for U.S. Real Estate

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Investors placing their bets on the United States once again.  Foreign banks, American private equity firms and a leading Chinese sovereign wealth fund have been investing in commercial real estate in the United States in the hope that interest rates stay low.

This increasing interest from investors could be a sign that the market is experiencing some stabilization.  According to Bob Steers, co-chairman of Cohen & Steers, a real estate investment firm, “We believe the real story is that capital is ready to buy, even though it may not be so visible today.”  As one example, the state-owned China Investment Corporation has enlisted several investment firms to identify commercial real estate opportunities in the United States.

Another sign of incipient recovery is the fact that Colony Capital won a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) auction for $1 billion worth of commercial property loans previously held by banks that had failed.  The transaction valued the loans at 44 cents on the dollar and is structured so the FDIC put up $136 million owns 60 percent of the equity.  Los Angeles-based Colony put up $90 million for a 40 percent share.  Colony’s founder, Tom Barrack, said the investment is “an implicit bet that rates stay low.”

In another example, JPMorgan Chase raised $625 million for Inland Western, which put $500 million into CMBS.  The deal was significant because it closed without assistance from the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF).

Sovereign Wealth Funds Still Interested in U.S. Real Estate

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have been closely watching the credit crisis evolve, according to a Deloitte LLP report.  The good news is that they haven’t entirely lost their taste for American commercial real estate. water-academy-wokshop-dsc_0451

Consider that two of 2008′s highest profile transactions were the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority’s $800 million acquisition of the iconic Chrysler Building and the Kuwait Investment Authority’s $3.95 billion joint venture to acquire the General Motors Building and three additional office towers.

Deloitte notes that SWFs are breaking with their “traditionally conservative, passive investment practices” to pursue interests in partnerships and joint ventures with American real estate firms and investors.  “This shift to broader and more active investment relationships may require that SWFs pay greater attention to increased political, media and public scrutiny, as well as their need for greater operational transparency,” according to the report.

SWFs will stick to the playbook of acquiring trophy and other Class A assets.  It’s unlikely that SWFs will focus on non-performing loans since that would require extensive involvement in the American legal system of foreclosure/bankruptcy in order to protect their rights as lenders.  The relative strength of the dollar — to the extent it is an indicator of future strengthening of the U.S. economy ahead of other countries — could be considered a way to protect the risk of any further currency decline in the home currencies of the SWFs.